Does GGG Deserve to be P4P No.1?

[D4thincarnation]

Golovkin got robbed by the Vegas Terrorist, but the fans knew he beat Canelo.

But not only that, he beat a fully roided up Clenelo with access to the most advance illegal PEDs in boxing.

Before the fight he was P4P top 3 and he beat another P4P top 10 guy, who was roided up to the gills and even made him get on his bike and not want to engage.


Do we need to take these things into account when assessing that fight and if so, does GGG rightfully belong at the top of the P4P table?

[Mammoth]

Nope................

[chrisJS]

No, pound for pound means "if all fighters were equal size who'd be the best?" Not "who has a better resume". He's a badass fighter but he's simply not as good as Crawford or Lomachenko. He's the best of the rest.

[285Kid]

No, Gassiev/Usyk winner is the P4P REAL #1

[Raggamuffin]

Golovkin got robbed by the Vegas Terrorist, but the fans knew he beat Canelo.

But not only that, he beat a fully roided up Clenelo with access to the most advance illegal PEDs in boxing.

Before the fight he was P4P top 3 and he beat another P4P top 10 guy, who was roided up to the gills and even made him get on his bike and not want to engage.


Do we need to take these things into account when assessing that fight and if so, does GGG rightfully belong at the top of the P4P table?

No. He had his chance but he wasn't trusting in hos own left hook. And I just wanted to remind you as a Pac fan that Marquez knocked Pac's dick in.

[boliodogs]

I have him number 2 after Loma. He is 36 years old and past prime. How far past prime should be answered on May 5th. A great performance by GGG and I'll put him number 1 again. PFP is just personal opinion and can rarely be proven right or wrong.

[R-C]

Top 15 for sure

[D4thincarnation]

No, Gassiev/Usyk winner is the P4P REAL #1

But have they had to fight a roided up freak with all the boxing terrorists against them?

[minemax]

Negative .

[Elroy The Great]

But have they had to fight a roided up freak with all the boxing terrorists against them?

assumptions or proof