Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If You Take Away GGG Punching Power WHAT DO YOU HAVE?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
    I like Buddy, but I think his assessment can apply to many fighters when you remove their strongest asset.

    Pacquiao - speed
    Ward - counter punching
    Canelo - power
    D. Garcia - counter punching
    Kovalev - power
    Crawford - power
    Fury - size
    Cotto - body punches
    Mayweather - IV

    Khan would be a top 3 welter if he only had a chin.
    I'd be tough, although I'm little,
    And no one would call me brittle,

    If I only had a CHIN...

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
      I like Buddy, but I think his assessment can apply to many fighters when you remove their strongest asset.

      Pacquiao - speed
      Ward - counter punching
      Canelo - power
      D. Garcia - counter punching
      Kovalev - power
      Crawford - power
      Fury - size
      Cotto - body punches
      Mayweather - IV

      Khan would be a top 3 welter if he only had a chin.
      Floyd one was good

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
        I like Buddy, but I think his assessment can apply to many fighters when you remove their strongest asset.

        Pacquiao - speed
        Ward - counter punching
        Canelo - power
        D. Garcia - counter punching
        Kovalev - power
        Crawford - power
        Fury - size
        Cotto - body punches
        Mayweather - IV

        Khan would be a top 3 welter if he only had a chin.
        but seriously ,Khan can be top3 WW he need to be smarter doe,and he will never be.
        Last edited by Canelo and GGG; 05-17-2017, 03:33 PM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Golovkin wasn't knocking everybody out in the amateurs but he seemed to do just fine without relying on his power there, didn't he?

          His boxing skills are extremely underrated. Not only is he bigger than Canelo, he's better too. Better technique, better balance, better footwork- he's a more complete fighter all round and that comes from his amateur pedigree.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by HeadShots View Post
            a dark hating.


            what else is new?
            what do you mean by a dark??? TBear

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
              Olympic silver medalist. Just outbox you on points like he did with lemieux. Great footwork, great jab, dosen't get hit when he dosen't want to, great timing, etc...
              I really dont get why ya'll love to bring up Lemieux like he is some special fighter...and even then GGG got hit alot

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                I like Buddy, but I think his assessment can apply to many fighters when you remove their strongest asset.

                Pacquiao - speed
                Ward - counter punching
                Canelo - power
                D. Garcia - counter punching
                Kovalev - power
                Crawford - power
                Fury - size
                Cotto - body punches
                Mayweather - IV

                Khan would be a top 3 welter if he only had a chin.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Oh man, I thought this was a troll thread but you have an actual world-class level trainer saying it. This beyond stupid.

                  Why subtract a fighter's best attribute? Let's take away Mayweather's reflexes. Pacquiao's left hand. Marquez's counter-punching. Hopkin's ring IQ. What are you left with?

                  Again, why would you ask a hypothetical question like this? It makes no sense. The power is there, it is a constant, game-changing menace.

                  This is so ridiculous. Honestly, sometimes this is the dumbest sport in the world.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                    I really dont get why ya'll love to bring up Lemieux like he is some special fighter...and even then GGG got hit alot
                    89 punches over 8 rounds isn't getting hit a lot by any stretch of the imagination. 89 is pretty much the peak number of punches he could've landed. Since compubox numbers are always in some way inflated because they can't always see whether a punch was blocked/parried or missed altogether, that stands that he probably landed fewer than 89. That goes for every fight too. Compubox isn't the end all be all obviously, but it's a general barometer of how many punches were "landed."
                    Last edited by AKAcronym; 05-17-2017, 05:30 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      If you take away McGirt's snack tray, what do you have? A less disgustingly fat McGirt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP