Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Sanchez Rejects Claims That Golovkin Faded in Canelo Rematch
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View PostYou are the one who responded to MY post genius. I essentially said he looked old with Jacobs, which he is. You don’t seem to think so. I guess 35 is a young age to you having 345 amateur fights and 40 professional. He has TONS OF BOXING MILEAGE ON HIM.
Save your lameness for someone who doesn’t see through your bull$h1T
he looked young with Brook.....
..... but then, he looked old with Jacobs.....
..... then, he looked young again with Vanes.....
..... and then..... old again, with Canelo.....
lol
Sanchez: Golovkin Not Slipping; Opposition Has Just Been Better!
https://www.boxingscene.com/sanchez-...better--114769
elite fighters can make an opponent look slow, limited, and yes..... old
not sure why you don't get that..... considering the fact that Abel Sanchez just painted you a pictureLast edited by aboutfkntime; 09-28-2018, 05:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Posthe looked young with Brook.....
..... but then, he looked old with Jacobs.....
..... then, he looked young again with Vanes.....
..... and then..... old again, with Canelo.....
lol
Sanchez: Golovkin Not Slipping; Opposition Has Just Been Better!
https://www.boxingscene.com/sanchez-...better--114769
elite fighters can make an opponent look slow, limited, and yes..... old
not sure why you don't get that..... considering the fact that Abel Sanchez just painted you a picture
Comment
-
Golovkin just so happened to fight better opposition when he got older. He started to show signs of something "off" in the Wade fight. Idk what it was, but something, to me at least, looked different. He hasn't looked the same since Lemieux. Funny people quoting what Sanchez says about Golovkin but consistently say what bull**** Abel always spews. He's not gonna say Gennady is old, but there's nobody who's gonna be 35/36 and still fight like they did 5-7 years ago, especially one with GGGs style.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View PostStill stuck on stupid? I imagine your but hurt cause you think I’m talking $h1t about Canelo. Im not. He did a good job. I want to see him fight young lions in that division that are full size.
nope, I think that you are making excuses for Golovkin
1) who did you pick to win ?
2) did you say pre-fight, that Golovkin was too old for Canelo ?
unless your answers are.....
1) Canelo
2) yes
..... mentioning age just sounds like an excuse
I agree that Golovkin is not a young man
I do not agree that is why he lost
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postnope, I think that you are making excuses for Golovkin
1) who did you pick to win ?
2) did you say pre-fight, that Golovkin was too old for Canelo ?
unless your answers are.....
1) Canelo
2) yes
..... mentioning age just sounds like an excuse
I agree that Golovkin is not a young man
I do not agree that is why he lost
Once again, if you don’t understand “boxing mileage”. There nothing I can do for you fan boy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View PostI picked Canelo to win. He lost the first fight though.
Once again, if you don’t understand “boxing mileage”. There nothing I can do for you fan boy.
link me to where you predicted that Canelo would win the rematch
your prediction does not need to specifically quote age as the reason
if you can provide that link, I will admit you have a point..... otherwise..... #excuses
I agree that Golovkin is not a young man
I do not agree that is why he lost
Comment
Comment