Originally posted by Ritz Kola
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The myth that Manny Pacquiao only fought opponents in their prime
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postonly resume counts..... NOTHING else
same with everyone else
but yea, you're right... there really is nothing to discuss
Comment
-
Originally posted by MusaWorld View PostLol Pac Tards like you are a disgrace. Running around saying Pacroid was only fighting boxers in their prime, when in reality, his biggest wins were against old, out-of-prime opponents.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ruedboy View PostDon't forget about Morales. Any resume that includes multiple fights with Morales, Barrera and Marquez is hard to top. Floyd's got the 0, but Manny's easily the most exciting fighter of his era.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ritz Kola View PostNo, everything listed counts. You don’t get props for fighting elite names but losing to every one of them. Resume is only a factor. Record is just as important. Floyd’s resume of names combined with his record of never losing is what makes him impressive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postthe..... " Pac always fights the best "..... myth.....
wtf ?
FACT: since leaving 130, Pac fought " the best "..... once
his later career was extremely " well-managed "..... only Golovkin has rivaled Pac in terms of careful matchmaking
his 135+ career is mostly a mixture of older fighters, and inhouse Top Rank jww's and mid-level welters
Pac is clearly a terrific fighter, which is where the haters let themselves down..... he took plenty of dangerous fights..... he just took them at the right time, under the right circumstances
#timing
interestingly..... 1) never fighting the best..... and 2) waiting for fighters to get old..... are (unbelievably) the two main criticisms that pacfans direct toward Mayweather..... wtf?
WTF? LMAO
Comment
-
-
The hate is deep from these casuals. All triggered because he beat a young, prime Thurman who Floyd ducked. LMAO.
Comment
-
Comment