Just for the record.
And I think Thurman outboxes Manny even if Thurman doesn't get the win through ref shenanigans.
But IF - and I stress that, IF - Manny runs through Thurman and makes him look like a basic fighter somehow...I have two questions for you.
1: Will you admit you were wrong and overrated Thurman based on the 'eye test'?
2: With NO VADA testing, will you admit/acknowledge the probability of Manny using drugs for that win (since there was NO VADA testing for Matthysse either)?
I'm not talking a close fight which is what I see as the outcome. I'm talking a complete dominant blowout from Mr. Pacquiao of a guy at the top of the rankings, which should be impossible. Will you admit?
And I think Thurman outboxes Manny even if Thurman doesn't get the win through ref shenanigans.
But IF - and I stress that, IF - Manny runs through Thurman and makes him look like a basic fighter somehow...I have two questions for you.
1: Will you admit you were wrong and overrated Thurman based on the 'eye test'?
2: With NO VADA testing, will you admit/acknowledge the probability of Manny using drugs for that win (since there was NO VADA testing for Matthysse either)?
I'm not talking a close fight which is what I see as the outcome. I'm talking a complete dominant blowout from Mr. Pacquiao of a guy at the top of the rankings, which should be impossible. Will you admit?
Comment