Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prime for Prime: Chris Mullen or Steve Nash

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    legacy, of course its nash... mullin's 2 olympic gold medals notwithstanding...

    prime for prime as in who was the better player?

    i'll take nash again... more versatile in a way he could contribute in more ways though mullin was the better shooter...

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by the mesiah View Post
      Lol..he's from new york..u got to roll with the hometown guys..haha
      I'm from Syracuse. You?

      Comment


      • #23
        stockton-nash prime for prime... who you think was better?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
          stockton-nash prime for prime... who you think was better?
          That one isn't close. Stockton.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
            stockton-nash prime for prime... who you think was better?
            Stockton.

            Better defender.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
              I'm from Syracuse. You?
              Nah, I'm just saying u got the cuse winning it and have love for mullen..I was just sayIng.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
                stockton-nash prime for prime... who you think was better?
                Close, but I'm going to go with Stockton. He created the style that Nash plays with. Based off that alone, I'll go with the creator over the re-creator.

                Originally posted by the mesiah View Post
                Nah, I'm just saying u got the cuse winning it and have love for mullen..I was just sayIng.
                Lol Oh ok.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez View Post
                  Everybody knows Nash's MVPs are a little fraudulant. Being a white hope in the NBA garners you 50% more attention than deserved. He's great no doubt, but that doesn't do much to actually bolster the argument.

                  That being said, Nash wins both. Mullen is overshadowed in his time and Nash's MVPs, as silly as they are, will contribute to his legacy. Pickup game.... Nash is a better threat in that environment.

                  ...I wonder if I still have my game gear stashed away somewhere w/ NBA JAM.
                  I don't have a problem with them because he was so valuable to those Suns teams. No matter who got injured or who was on the court, he made those players look better than they were, as evident by what happened when those players left.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by talip bin osman View Post
                    stockton-nash prime for prime... who you think was better?
                    Stockton. Man would have a couple rings if MJ hadn't been there.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      People don't give Steve Nash the credit for being one of the greatest shooters EVER PERIOD. His percentages are like that of PF's and centers but he gets alot of his points from the perimiter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP