Who’s the best between Crawford, Lomachenko & Spence?

[Blender]

SH|T IS HILARIOUS, when FACTS make people so mad. But no one has yet to give an EXAMPLE of what makes Loma #1P4P. Look through all the posts and you'll not see 1 reason AS TO WHY. This is a boxing site/forum for people to discuss Professional Boxing, and no one can speak on IF IT is defense/offense, ring generalship, fighting at a certain distance, inside fighting, ANYTHING! Thats WHY THEY MAD

There's no specific mathematical criteria for what makes someone number 1.

P4p 1 doesn't even mean most accomplished. Just means, if you adjust for weight, who you think is the best fighter.

The context of the totality of Lomas career, seeing his fights, seeing his ability, lots of people think he's the best fighter on the planet. He's fought enough and accomplished enough to make that determination. I don't know how you can watch a lot of boxing and not be blown away by Loma. But its pretty much everything. His footwork, defense, and adaptable tactics. To the way he fought Rigo. He completely nullified Rigo with boxing tactics and skills. Didn't overpower him. Dude has a genius level boxing IQ. And very very complete as a fighter. Rigo is no slouch, and the manner in which Loma nullified how Rigo fights was very impressive.

We've also seen Mikey and Crawford fight enough to get a good impression of them.

Mikey is an excellent fighter, but he's just not on the same level as Loma or Crawford. Skills wise or physicality. There's a reason Mikey doesn't want to fight either.

[Raggamuffin]

Who would you say is the best P4P between them?

Loma lost, Spence doesn’t have a resume yet and Bud is a undefeated lineal champion in 2 divisions. You draw it up.

[Raggamuffin]

Polls like the his used to tell me that Pac was better than Floyd. #Pollsdontmatter

[HURTFEELINGS]

There's no specific mathematical criteria for what makes someone number 1.

P4p 1 doesn't even mean most accomplished. Just means, if you adjust for weight, who you think is the best fighter.

The context of the totality of Lomas career, seeing his fights, seeing his ability, lots of people think he's the best fighter on the planet. He's fought enough and accomplished enough to make that determination. I don't know how you can watch a lot of boxing and not be blown away by Loma. But its pretty much everything. His footwork, defense, and adaptable tactics. To the way he fought Rigo. He completely nullified Rigo with boxing tactics and skills. Didn't overpower him. Dude has a genius level boxing IQ. And very very complete as a fighter. Rigo is no slouch, and the manner in which Loma nullified how Rigo fights was very impressive.

We've also seen Mikey and Crawford fight enough to get a good impression of them.

Mikey is an excellent fighter, but he's just not on the same level as Loma or Crawford. Skills wise or physicality. There's a reason Mikey doesn't want to fight either.

BRAVO, BRAVO TO YOU SIR....On a boxing site, someone gives reasons for what they believe in "boxing terms" not "because I said so" reason. But you were teetering on fanboy with "theres a reason Mikey doesnt want to fight either" but mikey says different according to his interviews.
If you are fighting someone 2 weight classes lower, YOURE SUPPOSED TO BEAT THEM/STOP THEM. If he's supposed to be so good. Mikey has sought new challenges at higher weight classes, and WON each time. Mikey has more KO'S than Loma has pro fights. And conquered The mountain of Salido, Loma couldnt successfully climb that mountain. And because they both fought the same guy, there is direct information for comparison available. If his loss doesnt count, who else gets those benefits, because for example Canelo has a better resume and a better LOSS.

[alexguiness]

Please for the love of god, SOMEONE give a reason that evenly applies to other boxers, namely Garcia. Because Crawford was at least a Unified Champion. Before Spence went to Brooks home and broke his face and took his belts, Brook was considered a good boxer. Loma has done nothing better than Crawford, Spence, or Garcia in the pro game. Loma has Russell, thats IT! And Russell might beat him in a rematch. Where would that put Russell if he defeats Loma in a rematch? Is he #1p4p if he beats Loma? since loma is held in such high regard? I bet not, because (alot of you know why) a guy with 11 fights is now considered to be #1P4P. That sh|ts on most boxers in the game to even think this, he lost to a guy who has 14LOSSES&4DRAWS........Canelo lost to someone who's record is 50-0 and Canelo has a far superior RESUME.....How does this SH|T add up?
I guess Tank is high up on your rankings.......

But Lomo is...white doe

['b']

Loma ain't nothin but a stiff ass Euro bum chump! Scurred a dem BBC genetics!

AYO u can have a WUT-WUT!!!

Peace brutha, we no wats up

[NChristo-]

Crawford or Loma as fighters, splitting hairs. Imo.

[daggum]

Loma lost, Spence doesn’t have a resume yet and Bud is a undefeated lineal champion in 2 divisions. You draw it up.

yep he lost he's out forever. there is nothing he can do or no one he can beat. there will always be undefeated fighters therefore they are better. tank davis is higher since he hasn't lost. lets only focus on losses...who does that benefit...oh the cherry pickers what a surprise. fighting a top guy in your second fight well that was dumb why didn't you cherry pick! improving since that fight? don't bother you already lost! stay stagnant and fight bums. you get all the accolades

[Raggamuffin]

yep he lost he's out forever. there is nothing he can do or no one he can beat

Go wake Pac up you ****en loser. And tell Loma to rematch Salido. All rough and tough style give Loma trouble because he can't fight inside. Lack of a left hand is why he won't become great. And Loma and Arum are what you armchairs call "cherry picking".

[lex_fugitive]

The Hornet.