Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CA just cant help its self

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by .!WAR RUIZ!. View Post
    Restoring your Second Amendment right to bear arms can be difficult and complicated. We urge you to read the full article, below, for complete information.

    In general, however, it may be possible for your gun rights to be restored following a conviction as long as it was not for:

    a felony involving a dangerous weapon, or
    a crime of domestic violence.
    ,

    lawyers are smart at least the expensive ones, they will not go straight to get your rights back, they will try to get your felony reduced to a misdemeanor, get that misdemeanor or reduced crime labled as non dangerous non repitive (or you state equivalent) than from their they will try some post conviction releif type of deal and then after getting it dropped as much as possible than they will go for restoring yoru rights. So by the time you go trying to get your rights restored your not this crazed motehrrucker who had a agg. assault with a weapon instead your some disordely conduct misdeamonor guy on paper So its possible just cause its says "FELONY IS A LIFETIME BAN" that isnt writted in stone lmfao just regular paper and ink, it can be maneuvered.
    Cmon dude you know what I was talking about. I wasnt talking about a wobblier.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by .!WAR RUIZ!. View Post
      Restoring your Second Amendment right to bear arms can be difficult and complicated. We urge you to read the full article, below, for complete information.

      In general, however, it may be possible for your gun rights to be restored following a conviction as long as it was not for:

      a felony involving a dangerous weapon, or
      a crime of domestic violence.
      ,

      lawyers are smart at least the expensive ones, they will not go straight to get your rights back, they will try to get your felony reduced to a misdemeanor, get that misdemeanor or reduced crime labled as non dangerous non repitive (or you state equivalent) than from their they will try some post conviction releif type of deal and then after getting it dropped as much as possible than they will go for restoring yoru rights. So by the time you go trying to get your rights restored your not this crazed motehrrucker who had a agg. assault with a weapon instead your some disordely conduct misdeamonor guy on paper So its possible just cause its says "FELONY IS A LIFETIME BAN" that isnt writted in stone lmfao just regular paper and ink, it can be maneuvered.
      Here Ill post the rest for you
      Restoring your Second Amendment right to bear arms can be difficult and complicated. We urge you to read the full article, below, for complete information.

      In general, however, it may be possible for your gun rights to be restored following a conviction as long as it was not for:

      a felony involving a dangerous weapon, or
      a crime of domestic violence.
      There are two basic ways to have gun rights restored after an eligible conviction:

      by having a "wobbler" felony reduced to a misdemeanor, or
      by receiving a pardon from the California governor.
      A "wobbler" is an offense that can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor. If you were convicted of a wobbler as a felony, you can petition the court to have it reduced to a misdemeanor. Once your felony is reduced you will be subject only to the restriction -- if any -- that the crime carries as a misdemeanor.

      The second way to have your Second Amendment right to bear arms restored after a California conviction is through a pardon by the governor.

      You must apply directly to the governor for a pardon if:

      you live outside California, or
      you were convicted of certain misdemeanor sex offenses.
      Otherwise, obtaining a pardon is a two-step process:

      Petition the superior court for a California Certificate of Rehabilitation.
      If the petition is granted, it automatically becomes a petition for a pardon from the California Governor.
      California's governor has complete discretion to grant or deny pardon requests. Generally, applicants must have resided for a minimum of seven years in California. They must also have had no criminal involvement for at least 10 years.

      We are a criminal defense firm with offices throughout California and Nevada. As former cops and prosecutors, we have first-hand knowledge of California's gun laws. And we know what it takes to restore your right to bear arms.

      Comment


      • #33
        California farmers furious over delayed payments for land seized in high-speed rail push

        Farmers up and down California’s Central Valley are up in arms over the state seizing their land to build its long-awaited high-speed railway and then failing to pay the hundreds of thousands of dollars owed them for years.

        Thanks to an order of possession by the Superior Court, California can take private land through eminent domain for the troubled bullet train project. While landowners are expected to eventually be reimbursed for the property – and for expenses like lost farming production, irrigation replacement projects and road construction – many farmers in California’s agricultural heartland say state officials have offered them a myriad of excuses as to why they haven’t yet doled out the cash.

        “I am out a quarter-million bucks on infrastructure, and they haven’t paid a dime for a year,” John Diepersloot, a fruit farmer who cleared a large parcel of his peach orchard to make way for the train, told The Los Angeles Times. “I don’t have that kind of money.”

        What’s even more frustrating for California’s farmers are the constantly changing plans for the train, the multiple delays in construction, the seemingly skeleton-staffed California High-Speed Rail Authority and the difficulty in getting concrete answers.

        Rail authority officials acknowledge they have not yet paid numerous landowners, but so far have not given a reason for the delay.


        Source, full story:
        https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cal...igh-speed-rail


        You cant even pay working American citizens for the land you took from them, but you're giving illegal aliens free healthcare.

        An absolute disgrace.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Lion81 View Post
          The people of San Diego would LOVE you. We get rednecks shipped in every year because of the military base and we fuking hate it. San Diegans and gun loving military flat topped rednecks couldn't be more different.

          Yea, we wouldn't last. 40 million strong and we can't possibly be independent like Canada, Poland, Costa Rica, New Zealand, Australia, Chile, Belgium, Portugal, Holland, Switzerland, Finland, Denmark, Sweden. All have less people than California.

          Oh man California would explode and sink into the ocean without America to help save us. I mean, we only lead the world in technology, cinema, wine production, agriculture production, but other than that, we're helpless.

          What would we ever do to survive.
          San Diego would be another ****hole city, indistinguishable from a Mexican border town without it's large republican population and military culture. but i bet that what you'd like given your low opinion of white service members, you piece of ****.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
            California farmers furious over delayed payments for land seized in high-speed rail push

            Farmers up and down California’s Central Valley are up in arms over the state seizing their land to build its long-awaited high-speed railway and then failing to pay the hundreds of thousands of dollars owed them for years.

            Thanks to an order of possession by the Superior Court, California can take private land through eminent domain for the troubled bullet train project. While landowners are expected to eventually be reimbursed for the property – and for expenses like lost farming production, irrigation replacement projects and road construction – many farmers in California’s agricultural heartland say state officials have offered them a myriad of excuses as to why they haven’t yet doled out the cash.

            “I am out a quarter-million bucks on infrastructure, and they haven’t paid a dime for a year,” John Diepersloot, a fruit farmer who cleared a large parcel of his peach orchard to make way for the train, told The Los Angeles Times. “I don’t have that kind of money.”

            What’s even more frustrating for California’s farmers are the constantly changing plans for the train, the multiple delays in construction, the seemingly skeleton-staffed California High-Speed Rail Authority and the difficulty in getting concrete answers.

            Rail authority officials acknowledge they have not yet paid numerous landowners, but so far have not given a reason for the delay.


            Source, full story:
            https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cal...igh-speed-rail


            You cant even pay working American citizens for the land you took from them, but you're giving illegal aliens free healthcare.

            An absolute disgrace.
            But talking land for a wall doe!

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
              And less debt.

              That's the thing, your State cant pay its bills now, and you're getting Federal dollars and military protection.

              You go on your own, good luck deficit spending like you are now without the US dollar backing you up.

              And on top of your bills now, you people would need to create a military to defend your nation.

              Considering you cant pay your existing bills, where would that money come from???
              Like the Democrats would ever allow California to secede. Without California they wouldn't win another election for the next 50 years.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by JimRaynor View Post
                Like the Democrats would ever allow California to secede. Without California they wouldn't win another election for the next 50 years.
                Exactly.

                The smart D players (there arent many) know the Math doesnt lie, and it's not possible fiscally.

                The dumb, political animal type D players think it would work out just fine, but they know exactly what you just said, this would hurt the team tremendously nationally.

                Thus it ain't happening, though it would be one hell of a show to watch if they somehow did.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by man down View Post
                  But talking land for a wall doe!
                  If it wasn't for double standards, they've have no standards at all.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by man down View Post
                    Here Ill post the rest for you
                    too much reading motherfucker you WIN! YOURE RIGHT, IM WRONG< IM SORRY GOT DAMNM!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by John Barron View Post
                      San Diego would be another ****hole city, indistinguishable from a Mexican border town without it's large republican population and military culture. but i bet that what you'd like given your low opinion of white service members, you piece of ****.

                      Suck my giant cokk you dirty redneck.

                      The last thing I want is to be called an American like you.

                      San Diego is what it is because it belongs to California and its people, Californians. If not, it would be another Tampa Bay. Full of redneck trash like you.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP