Originally posted by aboutfkntime
View Post
Pacs win over Thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. Better than floyds win over Pac who had been koed by JMM. Thurman was unbeaten champion, just like Floyd was. Just because Pac has a better resume than Thurman, doesn't mean Floyds win over Pac is better, it don't work like that. But in floyds fans simple minds it does, they don't understand context and im sure some boxing experts don't also.
Cautious Floyd wouldn't ever fight Thurman at 41, he wouldn't do it at 36 and had every excuse under sun not to go there.
Pacs win is better than anything on FLoyds resume. The majority of Boxing experts know that and any boxing expert who don't realize that aren't experts. Anyone who understands the word context know that. Thurman looked average against Lopez but he didn't against Pac as Thurman was a different man against Pac, whilst Nelo was average anyway at the time Floyd fought him looking bad average against trout because Nelo was nothing special back then.
Comment