Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rungvisai has a better resume than Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
    Nice speech. Rank him number if you want. You aren't changing my list and Crawford is much higher on my list of top 10 pfp boxers. Let us known when Rungvisai unifies 115 the way Crawford unified 140 if he can. Rungvisai just struggled to beat a guy he was supposed to knocdkout. Now just watch Crawford KO Horn the way a top pfp fighter is supposed to do.
    lol talk about exposing yourself...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
      No-one cares about rungavasai division though. Adult.males aren't meant to be that small so it's easier to get to the top, theres not many amerixan or european fighters in them divisions cause they grow up with good meals and the right nutrients. Crawford's well.ahead of him p4p.
      you act as if guys weighin 140 and 147 are giants. that was my weight in middle school. I could probably toss Crawford across a parking lot. thats not a good argument. Crawford's resume is dog **** and he's overrated AF. Rungvisai is ranked above him on any unbiased P4P standing.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Mastrangelo
        He has better resume than Mayweather.
        Don't be ridiculous.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth View Post
          Going by the level of people they've beaten.. we can start moving SSR into the top 3 p4p.

          He has a good argument based on competition to be #1 if not top 2 P4P
          P4P is based on resume AND skill set, though. Or at least it should be among intelligent boxing fans.

          No question that Sor Rungvisai has a nice resume. But if you watched him yesterday he is kind of clumsy and basic in the skills department.

          Comment


          • #35
            He ain’t even top 10 P4P yet lol

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by revelated View Post
              Tossup.

              Crawford's a better boxer, but Rungvisai IMO is more intelligent than people give him credit for. And nobody's been effective at beating Crawford's body yet, so we don't really know for sure.

              Keep also in mind, there's currently no test that would catch Performance Enhancing Rodents.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Rampad View Post
                Would you pick Mayorga to beat Forrest? Baldomir to beat Judah? Molina to beat Bey? Probably not. But skills dont automatically determine a winner either.
                Yes, true. Good point.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  He does have a better resume.

                  But Crawford has better skills than Rungvisai, though.
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                  Was Estrada P4P Top 10?
                  Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
                  When talking P4P, the question is: Would you pick Rungvisai to beat Crawford if they were the same weight? I absolutely wouldn't.

                  It's not only about resumes.
                  and this is why you dont waste your time arguing mythical rankings cause everyone use different criteria to make their mythical rankings.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Estrada was not even close to p4p top 10

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      He does have a better resume.

                      But Crawford has better skills than Rungvisai, though.
                      This sums it up perfectly

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP