Tweet
Why are we still disputing this?
50/50 isn’t viable.
50/50 isn’t viable.
-
-
It's all part of the effort to try and get delusional Wilder fanboys to actually admit their hero is an idiot who is cowardly pricing himself out.
He's a walking lie machine that lad. A stain on boxing and the WBC in particular -
Originally posted by 15 Rounds again View Post
AJ brings how many titles to the table?
How many titles does Wilder?Comment
-
Those are Fury titles tbfComment
-
-
Exactly. Wilder fans are delusional if they think 50 / 50 is remotely reasonable. 40% is generous for Wilder. He's a no mark.Originally posted by GAME OVER View PostComment
-
-
Originally posted by Phenom View Post
Schwartz is known as a fearsome opponent who doesn’t hold back, so you might be right.Comment
-
Show us some numbers and money that count otherwise!Comment
-
Of course Joshua is the A side & no one not fanboying for Wilder is even saying otherwise.
But you are making a false equation by saying Joshua is the A side so 50/50 isn't doable.
You can get whatever the best cut you can get from the A side as the B side. There's no hard rules with A side, B side sh^t like that.
Look no further than Charles Martin who wasn't the A side to Joshua but got f#cking PAID for his fight with him. Hearn overpaid to be able to lift that belt off of him. This sh^t is way more complicated, there are far too many variables in play & you can always hold out for your true value, whatever you think that is, til the other guy bends for one reason or another.
And personnally I say when a guy has a belt &/or is #2 in the world even if you are #1 & got a belt the other guy has leverage if you legit wanna be The Champ with no dispute.
Plus the reality is for both guys this is gonna be a career high payday so Wilder has added leverage for that reason.
But mainly my point is A side doesn't = A side gets x % & the B side gets y %. Its just not that simple in a free market sports world like boxing is.Comment
Comment