Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comparing the Klits to the ATG's is like comparing Lady Gaga to the Beatles

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Smee View Post
    Real talk, The Klits are the best, of this absoloutely terrible modern division, Guys like Ali, Lennox, Tyson, Bowe, Frazier, Foreman, Louis and Holmes were the real deal man, those guys could fight.

    The Klitschkos, they are just plain up not that good, the truth hurts, but the klitschkos fight these bums, and they dont even look good against them, Guys like Chambers, Peter, Arreolla, these guys would be cannon fodder, to get iced in the first round by the ATG's, hell the ATG's would be crucified for fighting suck worthless opposition, and with good reason, but the Klits are like celebrated for labouring to victory over these walking targets.

    It's just sad to see boxing go so far downhill to the fact where people actually think these bums are something special

    ok cut the ****...tyson,and holmes and even louis fought in **** divisions..yet you try to discredti wlad and vitali??tyson was ko'd by buster douglass(who??) louis was rocked and almost lost to the light heavy champ..ali was dropped by 185 pounders..fraziers claim to fame is beating a rusty ali and getting bounced off of the canvas by foreman...the klit bros are atg 's and rule thier division with an iron fist

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Sugar Sting Ray View Post
      Lady Gaga vs. the Beatles is the wrong analogy. You can actually make the argument that Lady Gaga is greater than the Beatles. She's a greater stage performer, greater at creating controversy, she's legitimately a great songwriter, plus she can dance but the Beatles can't. Not to mention that she has achieved what she has achieved working alone instead with 3 others. She has real classical music training, the Beatles were uneducated.

      Use a better analogy next time. Perhaps, Charice vs. the Beatles.
      No wonder why this idiot have red karma,

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Sugar Sting Ray View Post
        Lady Gaga vs. the Beatles is the wrong analogy. You can actually make the argument that Lady Gaga is greater than the Beatles. She's a greater stage performer, greater at creating controversy, she's legitimately a great songwriter, plus she can dance but the Beatles can't. Not to mention that she has achieved what she has achieved working alone instead with 3 others. She has real classical music training, the Beatles were uneducated.

        Use a better analogy next time. Perhaps, Charice vs. the Beatles.
        Oh dear....hopefully a piss-take

        Comment


        • #14
          I fail to see how Holmes resume is any better than Wlads. As a matter of fact he faced the exact same criticism that Wlad is facing now. You're terrible at making points.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by akathemack View Post
            i fail to see how holmes resume is any better than wlads. As a matter of fact he faced the exact same criticism that wlad is facing now. You're terrible at making points.
            exactly........his best win was against a fat fresh out of retirement punchy ali

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Natedatpkid View Post
              ATG thread although itll probably get deleted by some pro-klitchsko gay moderator.

              But it's true. I mean I respect them and their skills but Wlad should be killing these fools early if hes really that great. Im big on vital though, his problem is the divisions just weak.

              Good analogy though because like the heavyweight division look what pop music has turned into over the years hahaha trannies like kesha and lady gaga everywhere!
              So his style which by the way hasn't lost him a round in years is something to be slated against him?

              Its not like he is struggling with inferior competition and he is still stopping the majority of his opponents leaving him with I believe the top 5 highest ko/win rates of any active boxer.

              Much like Lennox who has heavily criticized while he was active I believe when Wlad is gone he will be much more appreciated and regarded as one of the best HWs ever.

              Comment


              • #17
                Wladimir wouldn't survive with the all time greats, can he even fight inside? Plus his weak chin!

                Vitali's very good and would be a contender at the very least..

                Comment


                • #18
                  wlad and vitai would beat ali,holmes,frazier,tyson..sorry but its true.......

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    The Klits are good fighters

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Great Afrikan View Post
                      Wladimir wouldn't survive with the all time greats, can he even fight inside? Plus his weak chin!

                      Vitali's very good and would be a contender at the very least..
                      yall always talk about wlads chin..ali was floored by 185 pounders,louis has been ko'd tyson has been ko'd,holmes has been ko'd,lennox was ko'd 2 times..true champs face adversity and comeback stronger..just like wlad has

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP