Originally posted by OnlyBeingHonest
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Parker: I'm a Big Risk - Joshua Needs Over 65%, Rematch Clause
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostYou ******s seem to think Parker and Wilder deserve more money for a bigger risk but Joshua should make less.
Why should Wilder and Parker make 10x what they usually make but Joshua barely break even with what he makes fighting Whyte?
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnlyBeingHonest View PostSo you'd rather see AJ fight Whyte rather than him paying them more? Stan!!!!!!
Would you rather them price themselves out because they want 10x they usually earn instead of taking 5x?
Mother****ers think Joshua should just pay them whatever they want. ******s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostDidn't say that.
Would you rather them price themselves out because they want 10x they usually earn instead of taking 5x?
Mother****ers think Joshua should just pay them whatever they want. ******s.
I just want to see a good fight. If fake promoters like you would quit complaining about percentages and just demand the fight by all means necessary, we may actually see it one day. But as long as you're "ohh they want 10x what they've ever made" Hearn has a built in excuse not to make it.
.5x, 10x, or 100x you won't profit from it, so why do you care? I answered your question, answer that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnlyBeingHonest View PostI actually don't care what they price themselves at. I won't make a dime off of either fight.
I just want to see a good fight. If fake promoters like you would quit complaining about percentages and just demand the fight by all means necessary, we may actually see it one day. But as long as you're "ohh they want 10x what they've ever made" Hearn has a built in excuse not to make it.
.5x, 10x, or 100x you won't profit from it, so why do you care? I answered your question, answer that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnlyBeingHonest View PostIts amazing how you stans excuse everything aj and Hearn does.
So now it's right to pay champions less than mandatories make? Okay! I saw everyone in the other thread everyone ignored Hearn saying he might just make the Whyte rematch. I guess that's fine too right? So how this works is AJ is fine to fight bums since he sells out crowds and both other champions want more money. You all aren't boxing fans, you're f@ggots in love with a man. Never seen men love men so much that they can't see any wrong they do. Like really are yall even this lenient with females? Probably not.
AJ is a commercial freak. When you get to that level % are dumb to talk about, Floyd used to pay most of his opponents (post Hatton) less than 10%. In some cases those guys were holding straps, and/or much bigger names than a guy like Parker. Canelo is a similar story.
Floyd took 33% against Oscar, at the time he was p4p #1 and a pretty big star in his own right.
Carlos Takam took around a 90-10 split against Joshua, and he made more money than Wilder or Parker have ever made in one fight...think about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sunny31 View PostStraw man.
AJ is a commercial freak. When you get to that level % are dumb to talk about, Floyd used to pay most of his opponents (post Hatton) less than 10%. In some cases those guys were holding straps, and/or much bigger names than a guy like Parker. Canelo is a similar story.
Floyd took 33% against Oscar, at the time he was p4p #1 and a pretty big star in his own right.
Carlos Takam took around a 90-10 split against Joshua, and he made more money than Wilder or Parker have ever made in one fight...think about that.
Comment
Comment