Originally posted by hhs661
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would David Lemieux have been the best PRIME opponent of Floyd Mayweather's career?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Xi_ View PostGGGtards and Floyd haters have been in full force doing damage control ever since b minus level Jacobs exposed Golovbums for being an overrated hypejob b level fighter. It's hilarious how they're scambling like little b1tches.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hhs661 View PostLemieux? We're talking the Rubio and Alcine defeated Lemieux? That's whay we're doing here?
What about Maidana? Devon Alexander ring a bell? Man I can go all day. Your double standards are hilarious man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Logic View PostLemieux has not lost since he was 21 or 22 years old. Maidana on the other hand lost to Devon Alexander only two years before he fought Floyd. Lemieux has an 83% KO%, Maidana 78%. Lemieux has 3 losses, the only ones other than GGG coming due to weight/stamina when he was 21 or 22, while Maidana has 5 losses.
GGG fought the best version of David Lemieux. Floyd fought Marcos Maidana in pillow gloves because he was so scared to fight the same guy that beat Broner, that he paid Maidana under the table to wear gloves that would dampen his power, which if you forgot was the only ****ing reason the fight would have been interesting at all in the first place, because that's all Maidana had was his power. But Floyd paid him off to take that away. And then still only won by majority decision.
GGG beat Lemieux by knockout.
So you go down the list, and every single category shows that GGG's win over Lemieux was better than Floyd's win over Maidana. You Floyd fans are unbelievable man. I mean he literally chose a one dimensional puncher to fight, out of everyone he could have chosen, and then paid him off not to wear puncher's gloves, which was the ONE THING he had. And then Floyd still almost lost. Are you ****ing kidding me? Floyd's career is a joke, and if you think beating Maidana in pillow gloves is a better win than knocking out David Lemieux, then your knowledge of boxing is a joke too.
And Who cares about Lemieux's KO ratio.... never stopped a quality opponent in his career. I don't care if you think Floyd's career is an illusion, you're free to do so but do not attempt to imply that Golovkin is fighting better opponents on the back of that reasoning, it's moronic. I'm done with this conversation.... interacting with you is a waste of my time.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Xi_ View PostGGGtards and Floyd haters have been in full force doing damage control ever since b minus level Jacobs exposed Golovbums for being an overrated hypejob b level fighter. It's hilarious how they're scambling like little b1tches.
Originally posted by Boxing Logic View PostCastillo? We talking about the Castillo that got KO'd four times before Floyd fought him, but still beat Floyd the first fight in most people's eyes? That's whay we're doing here???
What about Maidana? Devon Alexander ring a bell? Man I can go all day. Your double standards are hilarious man.
but my double standards, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hhs661 View PostThis is on some other **** too lol. The time put into giving someone like Lemieux
Yes, Castillo.. Castillo who had no amateur experience, turned pro at 16 or 17. Learned on the job and bounced back, put in the work and beat guys like Paez, Stevie Johnston. Compared to a guy who turned pro 3 years later and whether you think it makes a different or not, but your body as 16 year old turning 17 differs a lot from when you're 19 turning 20 as in Lemieux's case. Especially in a sport like boxing where any amateur experience, trumps being a teenager in Mexico turning pro
but my double standards, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by NaijaD View PostSimilar to Salido who also turned pro very early and was knocked out half a dozen times as a teenager but is undeniably one of the toughest guys in the sport.
Comment
-
Comment