I am on my most generous self today, so I would say that floyd's credentials as a whole up to date is but 35% talent and 65% pop corn...
what's your take?
Tangalong!
Why must you attack Floyd from this angle?
I hate the guy as much as anybody. But bummifying him like this is ridiculous.
In terms of skills there has never been a more technically skilled boxer ever in human history.
I like Pac better, but he would not beat him with superior skillset. It would be with overwhelming output, aggression, speed and movement combined with enough power and chin to make it all count.
I would say Floyd was 95% talent in the ring.. Outside the ring sure I'd say it's mostly popcorn lol
So Floyd is mostly a snack,made of corn,that people pour copious amounts of butter on and usually enjoy while watching a movie ? Does AMC sell boxes of 'Floyd's' ?
I hate the guy as much as anybody. But bummifying him like this is ridiculous.
In terms of skills there has never been a more technically skilled boxer ever in human history.
I like Pac better, but he would not beat him with superior skillset. It would be with overwhelming output, aggression, speed and movement combined with enough power and chin to make it all count.
I would say Floyd was 95% talent in the ring.. Outside the ring sure I'd say it's mostly popcorn lol
thanks for the 95% talent & 5% pop corn take on the topic...
that is really the object of the question....
so all in all floyd's antics etc etc is 5%....ok...
Comment