Originally posted by Derranged
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bleeding heart liberal dilemma
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DoubleLeftH00k View PostLiberalism that the New generations of liberals are aiming for are not thhe kind of liberalism that will create a good ending
Maybe ur too slow to notice
Ex.
If u dont alow gay dude to use the womens restroom they sue u
If ur a priest/preacher and u refuse to marry this gay couple they sue you
If they dont get what they want they burn cars and buildings hurting their own city
The new liberalism is going the wrong way and need to be corrected itself
If you have a sex change operation, that doesn't mean you are gay.
If the law of the land is gays can marry and the priest doesn't perform the ceremony, he is violating the federal law, that is why they are getting sued. The lawsuit is allowed by federal law, what is your complaint?
Huh? People that riot are not necessarily liberal you moron.
As with any political ideology there are positives and negatives. Overall, I think regardless of where you are on the spectrum, as society advances and develops, there needs to be change.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostYou are really stupid so it hard to have a meaningful conversation with you.
If you have a sex change operation, that doesn't mean you are gay.
If the law of the land is gays can marry and the priest doesn't perform the ceremony, he is violating the federal law, that is why they are getting sued. The lawsuit is allowed by federal law, what is your complaint?
Huh? People that riot are not necessarily liberal you moron.
As with any political ideology there are positives and negatives. Overall, I think regardless of where you are on the spectrum, as society advances and develops, there needs to be change.
If the priest cannot refuse to marry this fokers then u violated the priests freedom
If the restaurant owner cannot refuse to let u in the womens restroom as being a gay dude then ur violating the restaurants owners freedom
The reason why the right wingers won is because the new left went too far left under 8 years of obamo and needs to be corrected
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostYet those same people weren't concerned with the damage that Hillary could do. Someone who compromised our national security because she cannot handle Too Secret information securely. Someone who has lied to the public and Congress about major scandals. Someone with blood on her hands from Benghazi and many suspicious deaths of colleagues.
Comment
-
Nothing worse than conservative trash that resides online (mostly in youtube comments section) that goes online and posts inane nonsense like this posts and consistently attack liberals while sitting online with cheeto residue on their finger tips.
Liberals are taking over this country, like it or not
I AM A PROUD LIBERAL
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoubleLeftH00k View PostYes see u just agreed to what i said that the new liberals like urself are anti freedom in itself
If the priest cannot refuse to marry this fokers then u violated the priests freedom
If the restaurant owner cannot refuse to let u in the womens restroom as being a gay dude then ur violating the restaurants owners freedom
The reason why the right wingers won is because the new left went too far left under 8 years of obamo and needs to be corrected
Again you are calling transgender people gays which is very ignorant. You are not violating any freedom's because there is no freedom to discriminate. Its pretty simple-if you are a male or female transitioning to male-go to the men's bathroom. If you are female or transitioning to female, go to the women's bathroom.
How do you know if a transgender is using a bathroom unless you look at them? In women's bathrooms there are no urinals so you wont see any men standing up peeing. Conversely, no post op tranny is going to use a urinal. Why do so many white men want to watch people while they are using the restroom?
There are a number of reasons Trump won.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostNo you didn't violate the priest's freedom. The priest is a citizen of the US, as are the gays/lesbians that ask to be married. The law of the land is gay marriage. His refusal to marry them is breaking the law. Now if you want the church to be seen as a private entity, then fine, give up the tax exemption.
Again you are calling transgender people gays which is very ignorant. You are not violating any freedom's because there is no freedom to discriminate. Its pretty simple-if you are a male or female transitioning to male-go to the men's bathroom. If you are female or transitioning to female, go to the women's bathroom.
How do you know if a transgender is using a bathroom unless you look at them? In women's bathrooms there are no urinals so you wont see any men standing up peeing. Conversely, no post op tranny is going to use a urinal. Why do so many white men want to watch people while they are using the restroom?
There are a number of reasons Trump won.
Because White americans in this country particularly men assume that they have complete control over this country and stuff like this bothers them the most because control is lost in small increments and over time. The cracks of white ownership of this country is slowly showing itself through various things such as Gay's having rights, justice for unarmed police killings, transgender bathroom policies and many other environmentally friendly and liberal policies. They see how they are slowly losing hold of this country and then come up with coded racist slang such as ''we want our country back'' ''make our country great again'' Can you imagine if native americans said ''we want our country back''
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostNo you didn't violate the priest's freedom. The priest is a citizen of the US, as are the gays/lesbians that ask to be married. The law of the land is gay marriage.
You liberals never will grasp the Law of Unintended Consequences, will you?
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostThere are a number of reasons Trump won.
Why do you think Trump so stressed the fact the next President was appointing at least 1 Supreme Court Justice who would be instrumental in deciding these kinds of cases in the near future?
Comment
Comment