Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UK commentators disgusted by JMM-Pac 3 decision...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr View Post
    They should investigate with SLO MO

    so they will finally see that the judges made the right call
    saw it thrice in slow mo, marquez won.

    1) even ( if generous pac)
    2) marq
    3) pac
    4) even ( if anything marq round)
    5) marq
    6) marq
    7) marq
    8) marq
    9) marq
    10 even ( if generous pac)
    11) marq
    12) pac
    marq = 7 pac =2

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by WombBat View Post
      saw it thrice in slow mo, marquez won.

      1) even ( if generous pac)
      2) marq
      3) pac
      4) even ( if anything marq round)
      5) marq
      6) marq
      7) marq
      8) marq
      9) marq
      10 even ( if generous pac)
      11) marq
      12) pac
      marq = 7 pac =2
      too much evens in your scoring

      judges on ring side doesnt score like that, there has to be a winner

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr View Post
        They should investigate with SLO MO

        so they will finally see that the judges made the right call
        I watched it in slow motion just to make sure to myself who won and I had marquez winning by one point

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr View Post
          too much evens in your scoring

          judges on ring side doesnt score like that, there has to be a winner
          if i would give the close rounds to pac, marq still wins two rounds. but i would actually have it 8-4 marquez

          Comment


          • #15
            When you're on top of the world everyone wants to see you fail and fall. And anything they can use to get you down they will try. Law of life. The cash cow, ppv king and greatest fighter alive is stronger than that.

            Comment


            • #16

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by WombBat View Post
                if i would give the close rounds to pac, marq still wins two rounds. but i would actually have it 8-4 marquez
                what is your judging criteria?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Bombs View Post
                  When you're on top of the world everyone wants to see you fail and fall. And anything they can use to get you down they will try. Law of life. The cash cow, ppv king and greatest fighter alive is stronger than that.
                  Bombs I want to respect you, I think you're a stand up guy. But goddammit man, if your statement isn't completely contradictory to your avi headline "down goes Mayweather". It's irritational to make that kind of judgement and expect others to take your input seriously. Manny Pacquiao's performance was underwhelming and one dimensional. We see no fancy improvements, another disatisfied ruling against 38 yr old Marquez, the outcome a majority decision so with each guy he's fought he's progressively worsened since Ricky Hatton.(Cotto, if you're being nice disregarding the stipulations in favor of Manny)

                  I'm with the guy who said he should fight Mayweather already then retire. Win or lose. It's obvious he has enough distractions now, and showboating to his fans offering them post fight concerts, movies, comedy sitcoms as well as congressional duties are discouraging his training and focus.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr View Post
                    what is your judging criteria?
                    many things. who lands more clean effective punches, i do like agressiveness but he wasnt outworking him by that much.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by FloydPacquiaoJr View Post
                      Are you related to Check Hooks?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP