Fight contracts Splits decided on outcome

[HanzGruber]

because thats ******ed and gives judges or promoter even more incentive to rob someone

[Funky_Monk]

Bradley/Pacquiao I
Rios/Abril
De la Hoya/Sturm

The list goes on and on. Purse should be based on accomplishments combined with popularity/drawing power. The right guy doesn't always get the decision in boxing but he shouldn't lose his a part of his purse because of the judges incompetence.

That's a difference issue. Don't blur contracts with judges.

[Funky_Monk]

because thats ******ed and gives judges or promoter even more incentive to rob someone

It's true that it lends to more corruption potentially.
Having said that every other sport I can think of earnings are based on outcome.
Exception might be marathon runners who sometimes get paid to enter but often it's topped up if they win