Why do you Atheist guys make fun of religion then ducks a debate?

[Thraxox]

Sure buddy sure.

With answers like that it is easy to suggest because you have no refutation, you conceded through sarcasm and non-answers. But hey of course it is typical for atheist to do that when they fold through a conversation filled with facts.

[JJRod]

With answers like that it is easy to suggest because you have no refutation, you conceded through sarcasm and non-answers. But hey of course it is typical for atheist to do that when they gold through a conversation filled with facts.

Again. You and your guys are claiming that there is a god who created humans and the cosmos.
We're saying there is no proof of this. You're asking us to prove there is no proof!
You still don't understand the onus is on you to prove it.

But hey, you think you've won the argument. Good job "son"

[Thraxox]

Again. You and your guys are claiming that there is a god who created humans and the cosmos.
We're saying there is no proof of this. You're asking us to prove there is no proof!
You still don't understand the onus is on you to prove it.

But hey, you think you've won the argument. Good job "son"

Oh we've argued many, many times over to how the universe is rationally intelligible through intelligent design and how through the laws Philosophy of the designer-design (If there is a design, there must be a designer) made God the rational position. And that rationality cannot come from irrationality (Nothing cannot make something). We've argued both these points but all you do is close your ears and say "Blah blah blah can't hear you, no evidence yet."

And we argued through historical accuracy that Jesus of Nazareth existed, and he does through the historical text, witnesses to the point that no credible scholar would argue the otherwise. We argued both those points that the existence of God is a true notion.
And once more all you do is "Blah! blah blah, not an evidence!"

If you are not hearing what we are saying why the hell would we entertain you clowns if all you do is shut your ears?

[JJRod]

Oh we've argued many, many times over to how the universe is rationally intelligible through intelligent design and how through the laws Philosophy of the designer-design (If there is a design, there must be a designer) made God the rational position. And that rationality cannot come from irrationality (Nothing cannot make something). We've argued both these points but all you do is close your ears and say "Blah blah blah can't hear you, no evidence yet."

And we argued through historical accuracy that Jesus of Nazareth existed, and he does through the historical text, witnesses to the point that no credible scholar would argue the otherwise. We argued both those points that the existence of God is a true notion.
And once more all you do is "Blah! blah blah, not an evidence!"

If you are not hearing what we are saying why the hell would we entertain you clowns if all you do is shut your ears?

If there is a design there must be a designer.
Ok, so does this apply to God too? If so then who's his designer?

Nothing cannot make something.
Again does this Also apply to God? If so then what was the something that created him?

Or is this one of those things that conveniently applies to everything else except God?

[Thraxox]

If there is a design there must be a designer.
Ok, so does this apply to God too? If so then who's his designer?

Nothing cannot make something.
Again does this Also apply to God? If so then what was the something that created him?

Or is this one of those things that conveniently applies to everything else except God?

Definition of God: An omniscient, immaterial and omnipotent being that has no beginning and has no end. The embodiment of that what is reality and truth.

So now are we arguing if God is not eternal or what? - Red Herring.

[JJRod]

Definition of God: An omniscient, immaterial and omnipotent being that has no beginning and has no end. The embodiment of that what is reality and truth.

So now are we arguing if God is not eternal or what? - Red Herring.

You claimed something can come from nothing. So where did this eternal omnipotent force come from?

And just for fun can you tell me what dictionary you're getting that definition from?

[Thraxox]

]You claimed something can come from nothing.[/B] So where did this eternal omnipotent force come from?

I never claimed that. God did not came to be. He is the beginning of everything.

"God" is not created, if he was then he is not a God since it doesn't fit the criteria if an "Eternal" being which has no beginning and has no end.

This is the same common tactic for Atheist to disprove the point of God by asking "If God Created the universe then who created God?" Which have to then follow then who created GOd that created the god that created God so on and so forth till an infinite regress.

God is not created. He is the beginning, he is eternal.

[JJRod]

I never claimed that. God did not came to be. He is the beginning of everything.

"God" is not created, if he was then he is not a God since it doesn't fit the criteria if an "Eternal" being which has no beginning and has no end.

This is the same common tactic for Atheist to disprove the point of God by asking "If God Created the universe then who created God?" Which have to then follow then who created GOd that created the god that created God so on and so forth till an infinite regress.

God is not created. He is the beginning, he is eternal.

Just as I suspected. The same dribble from Christiananswers.net recycled as your own to appear to be intelligent.
Here let me save you some time. Next you're going to argue about how the universe had a beginning so it needs a creator, something about space and time, and its how it didn't exist before god etc etc. Rinse and repeat.

So a more sophisticated questioner might ask: If the universe needs a cause, then why doesn't God need a cause? And if God doesn't need a cause, why should the universe need a cause? In reply, Christians should use the following reasoning:

Everything which has a beginning has a cause.1

The universe has a beginning.

Therefore the universe has a cause.

Its important to stress the words in bold type. The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning, as will be shown below. God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn't need a cause. In addition, Einstein's general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space.

https://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c039.html

[Thraxox]

Just as I suspected. The same dribble from Christiananswers.net recycled as your own to appear to be intelligent.
Here let me save you some time. Next you're going to argue about space and time, and its how it didn't exist before god etc etc. Rinse and repeat.


https://christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c039.html

Oh wait. You cannot refute that because you have no refutation. All these points follows the Laws of Philosophy that:
1. If there is a Design there has to be a designer.
2.Rationality cannot come from rationality and one more:
3. that there cannot be an infinite regress of events.

If you can't comprehend that then put that in your pipe and smoke it.

[JJRod]

Oh wait. You cannot refute that because you have no refutation. All these points follows the Laws of Philosophy that:
1. If there is a Design there has to be a designer.
2.Rationality cannot come from rationality and one more:
3. that there cannot be an infinite regress of events.

If you can't comprehend that then put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Yes my friend.
design has to have a designer. Except for God.

Something could not come from nothing, except for God.

The bible is the true word of God, except for the parts that have been proven wrong. When that happens theyre simply metaphors.

Oh and Jesus was sent to earth to die a horrific death, so that our sins may be forgiven by his father (God) who loves us, and because he's omnipotent knew we would be sinners before he created us.

Im sold.