GGG resume is so bad with smoke and mirrors. The moment he stepped up and stopped fighting tomato cans he got exposed. He will go down a hype job who was fed bums to look good.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lampley: Golovkin's Entire Career A Failure If He Loses to Canelo
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostFailure he is. Shouldn't even make a shortlist for HOF. His best win is Jacobs.Originally posted by amuroray View PostYep his career has been called in question now.
Went life and death with jacobs and thats his only notable win.Originally posted by Bjl12 View PostEven that win has an asterisk as it was very close. And Danny Jacobs isnt some PFP champ.
Gennady is FINALLY over. Thank GOD.
Gennady got WALKED DOWN by a JMW LMFAO...Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostExposed he didnt get old. He just fought bums and got Kos. As soon as he faced quality fighters no more Kos oulanded in power shots by canelo TWICE, once by Jacobs and even welterweight Brook was oulanding him in power shots heading into the final round. GGG resume is garbage full of smoke and mirrors. Fought bum vanes got a ko looked like a killer again. Then got walked down by the smaller canelo and oulanded in power shots and got his face phuked up.Originally posted by O Prophet View PostBefore fight: Mexican style doe, he ran doe, big drama show doe, he fake doe, corruption doe, he cheated doe, he dirty doe, needle marks doe, he clown doe, fight like a man doe, toe to toe doe, he clown doe, no respect doe.
After fight: Runs to dressing room in shame.
Canelo beat the living **** out of Gaylovkin and sent him and you fools crying to the showers.
“You’re losing”- Abel SanchezOriginally posted by bigdunny1 View PostGGG resume is so bad with smoke and mirrors. The moment he stepped up and stopped fighting tomato cans he got exposed. He will go down a hype job who was fed bums to look good.
I have been ridiculed as a hater for saying that
and I used to like Golovkin
the ONLY reason I ever commented..... is because fighters who were MUCH BETTER than Golovkin got thrown under a bus by his idiot fanbase
oh, that..... and the lies/bullshht that have followed Gennady throughout his career
Canelo sunk the HMS Bullshht last night, and it was great lol
Comment
-
for the record..... I do not think that Golovkin's resume' is a total failure, like Lampley suggested
but..... with very few current/former champs faced, whether in victory or in defeat..... how valuable were the following fights.....?
THE LEDGER
fights that Golovkin COULD have taken, but CHOSE not to
* Lara
* Ward
* Mora
* Cotto
* Canelo (at 155)
* Saunders
* Derevyanchenko
notable wins
* Danny Jacobs*
we told you guys that Golovkin needed substance..... but all you shhthouse fans did, was make silly excuses..... thinking (probably knowing) that Golovkin was mostly hype, but thinking that would be enough at the end of the day.....
.....well. it wasn't enough
just saying
and believe you me, I could be a lot more scathing than that
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfor the record..... I do not think that Golovkin's resume' is a total failure, like Lampley suggested
but..... with very few current/former champs faced, whether in victory or in defeat..... how valuable were the following fights.....?
THE LEDGER
fights that Golovkin COULD have taken, but CHOSE not to
* Lara
* Ward
* Mora
* Cotto
* Canelo (at 155)
* Saunders
* Derevyanchenko
notable wins
* Danny Jacobs*
we told you guys that Golovkin needed substance..... but all you shhthouse fans did, was make silly excuses..... thinking (probably knowing) that Golovkin was mostly hype, but thinking that would be enough at the end of the day.....
.....well. it wasn't enough
just saying
and believe you me, I could be a lot more scathing than that
Comment
-
So let me get this straight this bytch BEFORE the fight says GGG entire career on the line if he loses then GGG loses Jim pulls a 180 and now he writes this long BS about how losing don't matter GGG is already a modern day Muhammad Ali LMAO
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfor the record..... I do not think that Golovkin's resume' is a total failure, like Lampley suggested
but..... with very few current/former champs faced, whether in victory or in defeat..... how valuable were the following fights.....?
THE LEDGER
fights that Golovkin COULD have taken, but CHOSE not to
* Lara
* Ward
* Mora
* Cotto
* Canelo (at 155)
* Saunders
* Derevyanchenko
notable wins
* Danny Jacobs*
we told you guys that Golovkin needed substance..... but all you shhthouse fans did, was make silly excuses..... thinking (probably knowing) that Golovkin was mostly hype, but thinking that would be enough at the end of the day.....
.....well. it wasn't enough
just saying
and believe you me, I could be a lot more scathing than that
abel and loeffler said lara brought no money or fans....yet he had headlined many shows on premium and regular cable was more known than most guys he fought
the problem was that them and hbo were looking for tailor made opponents .....yet all lil gs fans would say when lara was brought up was "oh lara? cmon?!?! lil g knocks him out in 4 easy"....LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by Curt Henning View Postprobably at least a half a dozen times where lara would have been a better fight than the guy they fought
abel and loeffler said lara brought no money or fans....yet he had headlined many shows on premium and regular cable was more known than most guys he fought
the problem was that them and hbo were looking for tailor made opponents .....yet all lil gs fans would say when lara was brought up was "oh lara? cmon?!?! lil g knocks him out in 4 easy"....LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostLara never moved up to 160. You guys are nuts. Name me some middleweight reigning champions that went down in weight. Since you think it's not a big deal it should be quite common.
you guys are the real nuts...your hero isn't what you wanted him to be..he lost and u guys are still here all day and night complaining about a robbery
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfor the record..... I do not think that Golovkin's resume' is a total failure, like Lampley suggested
but..... with very few current/former champs faced, whether in victory or in defeat..... how valuable were the following fights.....?
THE LEDGER
fights that Golovkin COULD have taken, but CHOSE not to
* Lara
* Ward
* Mora
* Cotto
* Canelo (at 155)
* Saunders
* Derevyanchenko
notable wins
* Danny Jacobs*
we told you guys that Golovkin needed substance..... but all you shhthouse fans did, was make silly excuses..... thinking (probably knowing) that Golovkin was mostly hype, but thinking that would be enough at the end of the day.....
.....well. it wasn't enough
just saying
and believe you me, I could be a lot more scathing than that
Comment
Comment