Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Denmark, With an Eye on Muslims, Requires New Citizens to Shake Hands

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ΣNΣMY View Post
    Stripping an individuals choice to not touch people for whatever reason is discrimination. You being ok with it under the guise of discrimination is child like.
    They actually have a choice. They can choose to immigrate to Denmark where you are required to adhere to cultural norms, or they can choose another country or stay in their origin country. When you immigrate into another country you are expected to respect their cultural norms.

    Also, you seriously examine your beliefs if you are OK with an ideology i.e. islam that perpetuates and promotes gender discrimination and the ill treatment of women.
    Last edited by BostonGuy; 12-29-2018, 11:22 AM.

    Comment


    • #52
      So from a consequentialist perspective, some Danes are going to be forced to shake hands with the people colonizing, raping & systematically replacing them?

      And they're worried the people colonizing, raping and systematically replacing them might be upset about it, because they don't enjoy handshakes?

      Good ol' ultramasochist Europe. This is the fate you chose.

      Comment


      • #53
        freedom of religion shouldn't apply to islam. there is no libertarian approach with islam, it should always be dealt with an authoritarian fist, not a ****ing handshake.
        Last edited by John Barron; 12-29-2018, 12:37 PM.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by BostonGuy View Post
          They actually have a choice. They can choose to immigrate to Denmark where you are required to adhere to cultural norms, or they can choose another country or stay in their origin country. When you immigrate into another country you are expected to respect their cultural norms.

          Also, you seriously examine your beliefs if you are OK with an ideology i.e. islam that perpetuates and promotes gender discrimination and the ill treatment of women.
          You got it all wrong. I dislike muslims as much as the next (boston) guy. My post was more towards the guy I replied to than anything to do with muslims so don't get your templar cross in a knot my friend.

          Being such a stickler for cultural norms I hope you never visit the middle east.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by ΣNΣMY View Post
            Stripping an individuals choice to not touch people for whatever reason is discrimination. You being ok with it under the guise of discrimination is child like.
            This individual has decided to join the community of the Danes. Is it then to much to ask if this individual wants to follow the rites and culture of the community this individual wants to be a part of?

            Comment


            • #56
              Part ("and parcel") of mass, replacement-level third-world immigration is giving up your freedoms & privileges to accommodate the cheap labor quotas of the extreme upper class and keep wages reasonably depressed.

              Part of that is going to be the political influence of the migrants, who will exert the same influence that shaped their homelands, and part of that will be the government using the migrants as an excuse to infringe upon personal rights (while outright refusing to actually freeze/end the colonization).

              The resulting civilization is a half-way point between the two component populations.

              I think people are exaggerating when they say pure sharia law will reign. The degenerate post-socialism Euro culture is rubbing off just as much on the african & islamic migrants, who are by and large drunken perverts (enticed by the modern, uniquely European practice of pimping your confused daughters out to foreigners & total total lack of ethnic identity).

              It will settle on a more Draconian/brutal version of one of the South American slaver countries. Ironically the Islamic component will probably be the thread of survival for the native Europeans, who can potentially exist as a tiny minority among them & the Muslims are less likely to welcome continued mass immigration from central Africa as its overpopulation hits the boiling point. If it were primarily subsaharan immigration then Euros would eventually be looking at South Africa/Zimbabwe-style ethnic purgings.

              The only viable futures for "Europe" are an ultranationalist movement in the US (culminating in a territorial secession) or an unprecedented birthrate recovery in the former USSR. I see people talk about hope for Western Europe but the numbers never make any sense.
              Last edited by ////; 12-30-2018, 10:17 AM.

              Comment


              • #57

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP