Sandy Hook victims' families can sue Remington

[TripleJ]

Sue all smartphone companies in general. Just to be ''safe''. They're supposed to be built smart enough not to be thrown at people !

I'd like to officially invite you into my class action suit. We just need to throw our phones at each other for a little while.

[Curtis Harper]

I'd like to officially invite you into my class action suit. We just need to throw our phones at each other for a little while.

I'm playing that hit single by The O'Jays ''For The Love Of Money'' right now

[Curtis Harper]

Has anyone attempted to sue the Twin Towers for not having an operational force field ????

[D4thincarnation]

This is true. We should also ban/sue coffee and vehicles. Same with go pros, they should be sued for documenting such disgusting violence and hate from the nz shooting. I haven't watched it but I hear the footage it captured was horrific, it shouldn't be allowed. Plus facebooks livestreaming should be shut down, why did they have to stream that? What the hell is wrong with facebook for showing that? While we're at it lets get rid of alcohol as well, something like 3.3mil alcohol related deaths every year worldwide, way more than remington guns.

If companies are negligent they get sued.

[Curtis Harper]

I'm suing Nike. My shoelaces were untied and i fell down a bunch of stairs ! I'm even going to sue the stairs.

[////]

The families must have some real characters in them too. A blatant cash grab from a random third party that played no role in enabling the shooting.

Imagine your family member dying & getting a team of lawyers to brainstorm every distantly related corporate entity you could sue to cash out until they hit the jackpot via a 203-year-old rifle manufacturer...

... Who didn't even design the gun in question (they invested in a subsidiary brand, which who turn manufactured copies of a standardized design which is also manufactured in Canada, Egypt, Taiwan, etc.).

They just sued everyone they could think of until a loopy socialist judge didn't throw out one of the cases I reckon.

[TripleJ]

If companies are negligent they get sued.

I agree. Just one problem in this situation though, the Remington rifle sadly appeared to operate flawlessly. So how exactly were they negligent?

[D4thincarnation]

I agree. Just one problem in this situation though, the Remington rifle sadly appeared to operate flawlessly. So how exactly were they negligent?

Did not explain the dangers of the gun and what could happen if the gun got in the wrong hands.

[TripleJ]

Did not explain the dangers of the gun and what could happen if the gun got in the wrong hands.

I don't see how that's negligence on their part. It's a weapon. Anyone with the ability to put two thoughts together knows that guns are dangerous, and that if used negligently or maliciously it will result in death or injury. It's not a secret. Are you implying you didn't know the dangers of guns until this happened? Will you stand behind a lawsuit against Renault because one of their cargo trucks was used in the Nice terror attack that killed 80 something people and injured over 400? Clearly a much deadlier attack, Renault should shoulder the blame for not explaining what getting hit by a 19 ton vehicle will do, and what could happen if the truck got in the wrong hands.

[Curtis Harper]

I agree. Just one problem in this situation though, the Remington rifle sadly appeared to operate flawlessly. So how exactly were they negligent?

''Gotta spread the Green, bruh''