How did the Republicans and Democrats roles reverse post civil rights movement?

[////]

In the sixties commies realized they could eventually seize permanent political power by pandering to non-whites and bringing in tens of millions of them through legal and illegal immigration. Their plan is working quite well and even if Trump wins in 2016 he won't be able to stop it even assuming he wanted to.

I agree and disagree.

I agree that mass immigration and European extinction were sparked by "useful idiots" who were brainwashed by Marxists.

But long-term, the Marxists themselves turned out to be useful idiots. Their plan isn't working out for them at all.

After their decades-long subversive campaigns destroying western racial identity and turning sexuality/gender upside down in hopes of erasing any obstacles for world socialism, their ideology was already too archaic to take control of anything.

It was no longer 1917. Nobody dreamed of being a unionized shoemaker paid in breadcrumbs. All of their destruction was for nothing. They died off and their sons are the homeless "cuckolds" you see in Occupy Wall Street videos.

So what became of that world without borders, where loving anyone or believing in anything makes you a dumb bigot?

Megacorporations simply walked in and took over. There was nothing there to stop them. Marxists created a perfectly sterile, globalized business environment where all native traditions were wiped out and only pie charts mattered.

You can kind of thank impotent hippie-era marxist idiots like Bernie Sanders for today's total corporate preeminence in every facet of life. It's the ultimate irony.

There is never a true threat of the left wing "taking over". It's just a matter of how much pointless destruction they will cause before giving up over and over.

[Chollo Vista]

Barry Goldwater

Please elaborate your point

[////]

Is that why Republicans win the south? because they welcomed innovation and economic growth

They win the south because the south is heavily religious and the democrat party nowadays is pretty much overtly anti-religion (except for islam since liberals are cowards who pick on the innocent but obey the violent).

Evangelical voters have huge influence in southern elections.

I've never liked it. Trump is so refreshing, talking about real issues like the border instead of harping on about abortion 24/7.

[ShoulderRoll]

I agree and disagree.

I agree that mass immigration and European extinction were sparked by "useful idiots" who were brainwashed by Marxists.

But long-term, the Marxists themselves turned out to be useful idiots. Their plan isn't working out for them at all.

After their decades-long subversive campaigns destroying western racial identity and turning sexuality/gender upside down in hopes of erasing any obstacles for world socialism, their ideology was already too archaic to take control of anything.

It was no longer 1917. Nobody dreamed of being a unionized shoemaker paid in breadcrumbs. All of their destruction was for nothing. They died off and their sons are the homeless "cuckolds" you see in Occupy Wall Street videos.

So what became of that world without borders, where loving anyone or believing in anything makes you a dumb bigot?

Megacorporations simply walked in and took over. There was nothing there to stop them. Marxists created a perfectly sterile, globalized business environment where all native traditions were wiped out and only pie charts mattered.

You can kind of thank impotent hippie-era marxist idiots like Bernie Sanders for today's total corporate preeminence in every facet of life. It's the ultimate irony.

There is never a true threat of the left wing "taking over". It's just a matter of how much pointless destruction they will cause before giving up over and over.

The bankers and corporations invented the whole "capitalism vs communism" conflict to divide then conquer. Early commie Leon Trotsky was funded by Wall Street investor Jacob Schiff.

[GTTofAK]

Is that why Republicans win the south? because they welcomed innovation and economic growth

No its because after the civil rights movement the democrats and the south moved away from each other. The democratic party was taken over by north east and west coast intellectuals and no longer represented the blue collar values of the south. This had been going on even before the civil rights movement but the democrats were able to use race to keep the south. Once civil rights passed and race taken off the table as a political issue the south realized that they had very little in common with the democratic party anymore.

[Chollo Vista]

bumpyyyyyy

[Phenom]

Have the Republicans ever won elections via a racial platform?

[Phenom]

Please elaborate your point

Democrats used to be pro slavery and republicans were started to abolish slavery democrats used to have southern dominance and republicans were doing well in states like Illinois, Massachusetts, New York and California

Lyndon Johnson lost the south for the Democrats and Barry Goldwater and his conservative movement cemented the south for GOP and made it this regional party it is today

[Enayze]

So to sum it up, pre-civil rights, Republicans welcomed innovation and economic growth.

While the democrats were able to win the massive black votes by using government handouts as incentives to sway the black vote which resulted in stagnating black inner city innovative growth and ambition.

Democrats held the South up until Reagan, that is when the switch happened.


Well I should more accurately say the switch happened with Bush Sr/Clinton because Reagan swept the whole United States in Red.

[Phenom]

Democrats held the South up until Reagan, that is when the switch happened.


Well I should more accurately say the switch happened with Bush Sr/Clinton because Reagan swept the whole United States in Red.

No you're wrong