Fatal Explosions reported at Ariana Grande concert in Manchester England.

[BKM-]

Nothing to keep up with.

You've given a singular example and infer that can be extrapolated across, what? most scenarios. It is a reductive argument.

This tragedy should not be an outlet for your agenda. Which is nonsensical in this context anyway as pointed out by hype job.

I am sure you're aware you're getting people's backs up. But just in case be sure to correct their grammar.

Yeah the agenda of being on the right side is such a bad thing.

What you're speaking of are the leftists who will go out of their way to defend islam whenever an attack like this happens.

They are the ones who don't care about the actual victims. Their idea of victims are people who hear the truth about their vile, dangerous and violent religion. They don't care about the children blown to pieces(unless the children are of a certain demograph).

[Sparked_26]

I infer nothing.

I showed an example of my stance working in a real-life situation.

Your side advocates the status quo, which seems to be (and correct me if I'm wrong) cowering, praying, and playing dead.

I know the facts here are tough to address, but please at least try.



Which I've stated it is not. Please, try and keep up here.

Plenty of posts of mine advocating an armed populace, and not just during terror attacks.

Again, you need to keep up a little better.

Oh right if you state it then it must be true, contrary to the posts you've actually made in this thread.

What I'd advocate is stricter security measures at all events with mass attendance.

And again there is nothing to keep up with. Nothing you have said is complex or thought provoking but purposefully obtuse and reductive. Such as your murder is a murder bit. Right, but guns are better at killing people than a pen-knife.

[1bad65]

Oh right if you state it then it must be true, contrary to the posts you've actually made in this thread.

Yes, it's true. The incident I sourced really happened. What's your take on that incident?

You're not even trying to keep up at this point.

What I'd advocate is stricter security measures at all events with mass attendance.

Which has nothing to do with my points.

Fyi, you can actually take multiple measures, ya know.

And again there is nothing to keep up with. Nothing you have said is complex or thought provoking but purposefully obtuse and reductive.

And yet you can't keep up.

Oh well, that speaks much about you.

Such as your murder is a murder bit. Right, but guns are better at killing people than a pen-knife.

Yes, dead is dead no matter the method used to kill.

That in no way addresses that point i made about that, so please, try yet again.

[*TonyMontana*]

Conjecture.

and that's not happens in the US when we shoot back.

Try again, please.

Also, give me your ideas for fighting back, without guns. I'm dying to hear those...

There is one thread in nsb and one in the lounge

Go ahead
Though your mind already seems made up

And keep up
You are now struggling to construct a proper sentence

[1bad65]

There is one thread in nsb and one in the lounge

Go ahead
Though your mind already seems made up

I'm not in the mood to search.

Just share your ideas, please.

My mind is always open. That's why I debate so much. If my stances cant stand up in open debate, I change them.

It's how I switched from being a Rep to a Libertarian, for example.

[Sparked_26]

Yes, it's true. The incident I sourced really happened. What's your take on that incident?

You're not even trying to keep up at this point.



Which has nothing to do with my points.

Fyi, you can actually take multiple measures, ya know.



And yet you can't keep up.

Oh well, that speaks much about you.



Yes, dead is dead no matter the method used to kill.

That in no way addresses that point i made about that, so please, try yet again.

You've drawn your line in the sand here and that's fine we are not going to agree. I used to know a guy we called Hated Martin this thread has made me think of him.

I've tried to put myself in a scenario where I had a gun in my pocket at a venue like the bataclan and I can't imagine it helping. Where as you can view the same scenario and imagine it would.

I am all for armed security at mass events and I am all for arming police but I can't see how putting a gun in the hands of Fat Kev at the football is gonna do any good which excuse me if I'm wrong is the your argument.

Your frame of reference is different to mine. As a generalisation of my nations marksmanship we don't really know how to use guns so the probability of shots being let off at random and at a random target is far greater here than your life experience allows you to believe.

Anyway, I don't want to engage anymore in this sort of chat. When what has happened is so tragic.

[1bad65]

You've drawn your line in the sand here and that's fine we are not going to agree.

Not at all.

Perhaps you're projecting.

I'm citing sources, and asking your opinion of those facts.

How the hell is that digging in???

I've tried to put myself in a scenario where I had a gun in my pocket at a venue like the bataclan and I can't imagine it helping. Where as you can view the same scenario and imagine it would.

Again, no "imagine" to it.

If you'd actually read my source you'd see that.

Your frame of reference is different to mine.

I completely agree. I'm citing a real world example and you're responding with political talking points.

Anyway, I don't want to engage anymore in this sort of chat.

I can see why. Retyping the same nonsense talking points over and over while ignoring sourced data must get boring fast.

When what has happened is so tragic.

And as long as we have people thinking like you in charge over there, get ready for more similar attacks.

We're warning you, but you wont listen.
Enjoy burying your children.

[AllBoxingAD]

I'm not in the mood to search.

Just share your ideas, please.

My mind is always open. That's why I debate so much. If my stances cant stand up in open debate, I change them.

It's how I switched from being a Rep to a Libertarian, for example.

How does the gun control debate apply to terrorist attacks?

I just dont see it.

[1bad65]

How does the gun control debate apply to terrorist attacks?

I just dont see it.

Terrorists prefer unarmed targets.

I advocate allowing the targets to be armed.
The other side advocates keeping them disarmed.

It's quite relevant.

[AllBoxingAD]

Terrorists prefer unarmed targets.

I advocate allowing the targets to be armed.
The other side advocates keeping them disarmed.

It's quite relevant.

Armed where?

Terrorists know where to find people who are unarmed.

They are crazy but not stupid.