With the assumption that scoring points is the main determiner for winning this fight, we have the following formulas:
Option A: Lara
>Punches that don't land, don't mean anything in terms of hard punching, or score points.
>Therefore, hard punches do not take priority over punches that land.
>Moreover, the fighter who lands the most punches is the most effective.
>Lara won.
Option B: Canelo
>Hard punches that don't land score points.
>Therefore, hard punches take priority over punches that don't land.
>Moreover, the fighter who throws the most hard punches is the most effective.
>Canelo won.
Which sounds more logical to you?
Option A: Lara
>Punches that don't land, don't mean anything in terms of hard punching, or score points.
>Therefore, hard punches do not take priority over punches that land.
>Moreover, the fighter who lands the most punches is the most effective.
>Lara won.
Option B: Canelo
>Hard punches that don't land score points.
>Therefore, hard punches take priority over punches that don't land.
>Moreover, the fighter who throws the most hard punches is the most effective.
>Canelo won.
Which sounds more logical to you?
Comment