Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muhammed Ali vs Jack Johnson?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Clay will not lose a round or suffer any damage whatsoever. Johnny's defensive skills were great for a man standing right in front of him trying to clinch. Clay is not playing into his clinching waltz, pal. It would be one of the worst mismatches in boxing history.

    Comment


    • #22
      Why do you call ali, clay?

      Comment


      • #23
        - -Never heared of Cassius Clay?

        Good enough for Joe who whooped all the jinn outta him in the Fight of the Century.

        Comment


        • #24
          Yes but why call him that? Frazier did in order to try and wind him up in a fight. To continue to refer to him as that is pretty disrespectful as he changed his name as the original clay was plantation owner (although ironically he became an abolitionist). Just seems a bit nasty and unnecessary.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by cfang View Post
            Why do you call ali, clay?
            By buggery, because it was good enough for his mother!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by cfang View Post
              Yes but why call him that? Frazier did in order to try and wind him up in a fight. To continue to refer to him as that is pretty disrespectful as he changed his name as the original clay was plantation owner (although ironically he became an abolitionist). Just seems a bit nasty and unnecessary.
              - -Ever hear of tit for tat?

              Calling Joe an Uncle Tom working for The Man infinitely the bigger insult.

              Then The Gorilla in Manilla.

              Comment


              • #27
                I don't call any apostate by a made up Moslem name.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP