Why won't Crawford challenge a welterweight, instead of old faded Pacquiao?

[The Hammer]

Like Thurman or the winner of Spence-Brook?

[A.K]

because PAC is the money fight , and a old faded PAC is probably still the best ww around.

[Lester Tutor]

He did say Thurman

[The Hammer]

because PAC is the money fight , and a old faded PAC is probably still the best ww around.

If Brook beats Spence, then Brook-Crawford in the UK would be a huge money fight.

[KingHippo]

He just called out Thurman you dumb@ss

You're too old for this go to bed loser

[The Hammer]

He just called out Thurman you dumb@ss

You're a dumb hippopotamus.

Arum said Crawford won't be fighting Thurman. Too risky an opponent.

http://www.boxingscene.com/arum-admi...pening--116819

[VatoMulatto]

Pac is a legend. A win over Pac means a lot for his legacy and it will bring him the best payday of his career. Don't forget the mainstream attention that comes with fighting a superstar like Pac. It would take Crawford to the next level when it comes to money, fame and everything.

[Raonic]

Manny Pacquiao is the top WW and the highest ranked WW fighter in the P4P rankings.

Everyone should be chasing Manny.

[soul_survivor]

Like Thurman or the winner of Spence-Brook?

Crawford brought up Thurman and said he'd fight him but can you begrudge the guy from chasing the biggest pay day of his career against the biggest legend in the sport right now? I can't.

I also think TC beats the version of Pac we saw against Vargas (won comfortably but lookedl ike he was imitating himself).

[The Hammer]

Manny Pacquiao is the top WW and the highest ranked WW fighter in the P4P rankings.

Everyone should be chasing Manny.

Manny Pacquiao has been past his prime for at least 5 years now. His best was 2005 to 2011.

That's why all the vultures want a piece of him.