Tweet
Moussasi vs King Mo is prime example of bull**** MMA rules. Moussasi landed 130 more strikes and had more submission attempts, yet King Mo wins the decision because he spammed Moussasi with takedowns. That is pure ****.
-
-
4-1 Mo, and I really wanted Mousasi to win.... -
Mo is Mark Coleman 4.0...Comment
-
Oh and LOfugginL @ Mo wanting to fight Rampage. That would end badly for him...Comment
-
Mo could fight Rampage. For some reason Rampage forgot how to wrestle since comming to the UFC.
As for the topic..... gotta score points. lolComment
-
4 rounds to 1 for Mo. The first two fights were competitive but the last 3 rounds were easy scores for Mo. I gave Mousasi round 2 because Mo basically did shot form the top, Mousasi landed good blows form the bottom, landed nice combos when they stood up, and took Mo's back.Comment
-
-
well obviously under the MMA judging system King Mo won but it was a BS win.Originally posted by kaps View Post
The way its looking right now, takedown spamming is the future of MMA. If MMA continues to degrade at this pace, I don't think I'll be watching it any more in about 4-5 years.Comment
-
That's why I think they should allow knees and kicks to a downed opponents head. It helps neutralize wrestling....Originally posted by kswizzy99 View PostComment
-
thats what I was thinking. and I find it really ******ed that if both fighters are on the ground, they can't kick or knee each other in the head. I understand maybe if 1 fighter is down, but the fact that both fighters are down and it isn't allowed is ridiculous. Moussasi would have had a much better chance of finishing if that ridiculous rule didn't exist.Originally posted by kaps View PostComment
Comment