Corbin says ; he homes of rich people in Kensington should be SEIZED

[1bad65]

The problems Venezuela are facing have less to do with Socialism and more to do with the economic sanctions the mighty USA have hit them with.

So because a capitalist country refused to trade with them a socialist country economically imploded.

Lmfao!!!!

That's serious Gruber logic right there.

I can't believe even you believe your own nonsense.

[Enayze]

The homes of rich people in Kensington should be SEIZED for Grenfell Tower residents made homeless by fire, says Corbyn

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz4k67t2oH5
Follow us: mailonline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

This dude is a straight up Communist and a danger to the West,with Sanders and the Liberals going far left and Left aggression,Corbyn in The United Kingdom and the sentiment in whole Western europe by our Politicians we are ahead of dangerous times my friend,The western world as we know might fall

Of course he does, because he's a communist in socialist clothes. And he is only in socialist clothes because communism is not currently embraced, and socialism is as close as he can get to it without looking like a complete jacka$$.

[EL_GRINGO]

When you say 'homes' here you actually mean empty and unused investment properties, many of which our owned by wealthy foreign nationals purely to profit from the UK housing market. I'm actually just fine with this - I think the housing crisis caused by the artificial inflation of house prices combined with a deliberate under provision of affordable housing is an obscenity. This country is seeing levels of homelessness increasingly affecting not just the traditional groups but even working families. I ain't seeing why empty properties shouldn't be appropriated to avert what amounts to a humanitarian crisis on a temporary basis provided the owners are reinbursed. Why the hell not?

Well i don't agree,it's the governments duty to find these people shelter,that's why we are paying taxes in the first place,for when these type of events occur,i have no problem with the government asking these home owners of these empty houses if they are willing to temporarily rent out these houses to those in need payed for by the government our the owner of the apartment block at normal rent rates.
And signed in a contract if any damages are left the property will be restored in it's original state,But Corbyn is saying ; siege these homes,leaving the home owners no choice on the matter which is taking it much too far

[EL_GRINGO]

The dailymail is the UK's equivalent to Fox News. Complete and utter trash.

The people who lost their homes and in some cases their lives need to be compensated heavily and rehoused immediately in the surrounding areas. If that means temporarily placing these unlucky souls in empty houses in such areas as Chelsea and Kensington, so ****ing be it.

What happened in grenfell tower was wholly unavoidable and the culprits need to be held to account.

I agree that the culprits need to be held accountable and should be compensated by those guilty,and the government should provide them with shelter but sieging peoples home empty or not without giving them any choice in the matter is 5 bridges too far,this is not North Korea or The Soviet Union.
The daily mail is for the right what the huffington post or the Guardian is for the left....

[Sparked_26]

When you sieze assets, people stop buying, investing, etc.

That's what Venezuela did. And now the people there are literally eating zoo animals to survive.

Go ahead and follow that example if you want.

Thankfully we here in the US refuted that garbage in November.

It's London not some backwater shit-town..Londoners want to live in London.

What labour/Corbyn/Normal people have an issue with is buy to let merchants.

London doesn't need foreign investors to leave apartments empty or to buy to let ensuring property prices are outside the remit of well, anyone really.

The answer for some is to move. I've moved.

That said I think it's the Englishman's home is his castle thing we have that is outdated now. Germans' rent for life I bet they don't have these kinds of issues.

It goes without saying that council is in deep trouble.

But another point is that building was a council-owned building but also had private owners in it. So a direct result of some of these 'investors' was Londoners being squeezed into poor housing because it was affordable.

Honestly, it's sad for all Londoners below a certain age about what is happening with our housing there.

In your own rhetoric that housing bubble needs to burst or 'we're gonna have to dig more graves'.

I say this as a son of someone who has a fairly modest house in London which is worth a million quid. It's nonsensical. People sit on gold-mines but the human cost of that is other people can't afford housing and families split up.

Money? nobody gets buried with it.

You will get buried if you live in a piece of shit building though with no smoke alarms, sprinklers, and cladding on the front of the building to make it look pretty but that acts like a ****ing chimney.

This post isn't a go at you by the way. But the state of play in London concerning housing is a joke.

What's happened there is an absolute tragedy.

[Sparked_26]

corbyn says a lot of things, very little of which make sense. Hes pretty well off, why doesnt he let some of the residents stay with him? Hes a champagne socialist and a hypocrite.

This palace?

Case in point.

£925,000 for the house next door to Jeremy's (the one with all the plants).

Not arguing that Jeremy has money though. He does. Lots.

[Adamjr91]

I agree that the culprits need to be held accountable and should be compensated by those guilty,and the government should provide them with shelter but sieging peoples home empty or not without giving them any choice in the matter is 5 bridges too far,this is not North Korea or The Soviet Union.
The daily mail is for the right what the huffington post or the Guardian is for the left....

There is a housing crisis in London. Started by Thatcher in the 70s and made worse by successive Conservative and Labour governments. Simply put, the majority of social housing in London has been sold off.

The tower block fire was a bridge too far. Temporarily rehousing the victims of the fire in the empty houses in and around the borough is completely acceptable.

The title of this thread is misleading at best and deceiving at worst. I expect nothing less from the DM.

[EL_GRINGO]

There is a housing crisis in London. Started by Thatcher in the 70s and made worse by successive Conservative and Labour governments. Simply put, the majority of social housing in London has been sold off.

The tower block fire was a bridge too far. Temporarily rehousing the victims of the fire in the empty houses in and around the borough is completely acceptable.

The title of this thread is misleading at best and deceiving at worst. I expect nothing less from the DM.

The title of this thread isn't misleading at all,the fact that these homes are empty doesn't matter one bit,you just justify seizing peoples home because they're empty and that's bull****,they're privately owned,you can't go seizing people property just like that,and the tower fire was a bridge too far,yes but that ain't the problem of private home owners who's homes are empty,private property is private property period.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

The problems Venezuela are facing have less to do with Socialism and more to do with the economic sanctions the mighty USA have hit them with.

That's totally wrong..

The reason Venezuela is in trouble is because the government took over everything, became "too big to fail" and then did exactly that and failed when government cash cow of oil plummeted .
When everything from medicine, food, water, milk, energy, etc is provided by one centralized government, of course shortages are going to happen when that government goes broke....

The economist had a great article on it

[////]

TY to the dnc for ****ing over bernie the literal maniac padded cell inhabitant sanders