floyd should be number 1 but he did take off almost 2 years but no fighter on that list has been more skilled or as dominant as him---and manny pacman will find out why floyd really is number one--had floyd not retired, he'd be fighter of the decade--but it doesn't matte--he's still the best fighter of the last 4 deacdes imo--and the most technically gifted and most skilled fighter boxing has ever seen---i have no problem with them giving it to pac, he did more than enough based on achievement---he is a special fighter and a champion's champion---pac has proved that he has more than enough to be an all time grerat--but he will lose to floyd bad come march 13, 2010---
floyd should be number 1 but he did take off almost 2 years but no fighter on that list has been more skilled or as dominant as him---and manny pacman will find out why floyd really is number one--had floyd not retired, he'd be fighter of the decade--but it doesn't matte--he's still the best fighter of the last 4 deacdes imo--and the most technically gifted and most skilled fighter boxing has ever seen---i have no problem with them giving it to pac, he did more than enough based on achievement---he is a special fighter and a champion's champion---pac has proved that he has more than enough to be an all time grerat--but he will lose to floyd bad come march 13, 2010---
well he hasn't yet so your floyd worshipping post is irrelevant and next year is another decade!
even if he beats manny on 2010 he has to keep fighting worthy and challenging fights for another 10 years to be the Fighter of the decade to come. do you think that's going to happen?
Comment