espn's top 50 fighters alltime as of 2007

[Big Op]

1. Sugar Ray Robinson
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Henry Armstrong
4. Joe Louis
5. Willie Pep
6. Roberto Duran
7. Benny Leonard
8. Jack Johnson
9. Jack Dempsey
10. Sam Langford
11. Joe Gans
12. Sugar Ray Leonard
13. Harry Greb
14. Rocky Marciano
15. Jimmy Wilde
16. Gene Tunney
17. Mickey Walker
19. Stanley Ketchel
20. George Foreman
21. Tony Canzoneri
22. Barney Ross
23. Jimmy McLarnin
24. Julio Cesar Chavez
25. Marcel Cerdan
26. Joe Frazier
27. Ezzard Charles
18. Archie Moore
28. Jake LaMotta
29. Sandy Saddler
30. Terry McGovern
31. Billy Conn
32. Jose Napoles
33. Ruben Olivares
34. Emile Griffith
35. Marvin Hagler
36. Eder Jofre
37. Thomas Hearns
38. Larry Holmes
39. Oscar De La Hoya
40. Evander Holyfield
41. Ted "Kid" Lewis
42. Alexis Arguello
43. Marco Antonio Barrera
44. Pernell Whitaker
45. Carlos Monzon
46. Roy Jones Jr.
47. Bernard Hopkins
48. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
49. Erik Morales
50. Mike Tyson

do you agree with this list if not explain why.

[JAB5239]

1. Sugar Ray Robinson
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Henry Armstrong
4. Joe Louis
5. Willie Pep
6. Roberto Duran
7. Benny Leonard
8. Jack Johnson
9. Jack Dempsey
10. Sam Langford
11. Joe Gans
12. Sugar Ray Leonard
13. Harry Greb
14. Rocky Marciano
15. Jimmy Wilde
16. Gene Tunney
17. Mickey Walker
19. Stanley Ketchel
20. George Foreman
21. Tony Canzoneri
22. Barney Ross
23. Jimmy McLarnin
24. Julio Cesar Chavez
25. Marcel Cerdan
26. Joe Frazier
27. Ezzard Charles
18. Archie Moore
28. Jake LaMotta
29. Sandy Saddler
30. Terry McGovern
31. Billy Conn
32. Jose Napoles
33. Ruben Olivares
34. Emile Griffith
35. Marvin Hagler
36. Eder Jofre
37. Thomas Hearns
38. Larry Holmes
39. Oscar De La Hoya
40. Evander Holyfield
41. Ted "Kid" Lewis
42. Alexis Arguello
43. Marco Antonio Barrera
44. Pernell Whitaker
45. Carlos Monzon
46. Roy Jones Jr.
47. Bernard Hopkins
48. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
49. Erik Morales
50. Mike Tyson

do you agree with this list if not explain why.i can't disagree or agree im not 100 years old.

Overall is a crappy list that has been discussed here many times. There are so many things to pick apart that I don't even know where to start.

[Big Op]

Overall is a crappy list that has been discussed here many times. There are so many things to pick apart that I don't even know where to start.

you can start by who is more credible someone whose profession is being a boxing analyst or someone who posts on boxingscene who has no credibility in what he thinks/says are the greatest fighters

[BigStereotype]

you can start by who is more credible someone whose profession is being a boxing analyst or someone who posts on boxingscene who has no credibility in what he thinks/says are the greatest fighters

Working on ESPN doesn't make you credible hahaha That list has Oscar significantly ahead of Arguello and Pernell Whitaker at 44th. And last I checked, you too post on boxing scene so...yeah.

[Big Op]

Working on ESPN doesn't make you credible hahaha That list has Oscar significantly ahead of Arguello and Pernell Whitaker at 44th. And last I checked, you too post on boxing scene so...yeah.

but really some posters on here have whitaker and monzon ahead of julio cesar chavez despite him being a three division champ and facing the best there was

[BigStereotype]

but really some posters on here have whitaker and monzon ahead of julio cesar chavez despite him being a three division champ and facing the best there was

Whitaker is ahead of Chavez, unquestionably.

[talip bin osman]

there were some corrections made to this ESPN list done by mr. cox on a rival website...

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/espn.html

[JAB5239]

you can start by who is more credible someone whose profession is being a boxing analyst or someone who posts on boxingscene who has no credibility in what he thinks/says are the greatest fighters

I appreciate you getting this out of the way and immediately letting us know this was a troll thread. But to answer your question....I know plenty of posters on here and other sites that show more insight and knowledge of the sport of boxing than most sports analysts. And considering one of the main criteria for this list was mainstream appeal, this list can never give an accurate description of the 50 greatest fighters all time.

[Big Op]

there were some corrections made to this ESPN list done by mr. cox on a rival website...

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/espn.html

it's basically the same ****

[talip bin osman]

but really some posters on here have whitaker and monzon ahead of julio cesar chavez despite him being a three division champ and facing the best there was

dont complain man... instead, defend it... why JCC must be rated ahead of whitaker and monzon...