just wondering are todays fighters physically bigger than fighters of the 40's through eighties because of the weigh in differences now compared to than. For example Camacho jr fights at middleweight and is much heavier in the ring. So are fighters a traditional class bigger than the past or a jr class bigger?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
making weight?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by rightsideup View Postjust wondering are todays fighters physically bigger than fighters of the 40's through eighties because of the weigh in differences now compared to than. For example Camacho jr fights at middleweight and is much heavier in the ring. So are fighters a traditional class bigger than the past or a jr class bigger?
Comment
-
Their not bigger now they just have the luxury of rehydration and fighting in a lower class they shouldn't be in. The best example is Chavez Jr. no way is he a Middleweight or "super" middle. But he is getting away with dehydrating because of the 40 hours they get to rehydrate.
When you cnsider that Sugar was 5'11" at 147 and then at 160 he is taller than any welter or middle who's active today.
The "junior" weight classes should be for prelim bouts for young guys coming up who are "inbetween" weight classes as they mature.
The promoter use the junior/super garbage to promote more titles! The fans buy it, so there you go.
Dempsey is considered small for a heavy these days yet we just wen5t through an era when Tyson was the number 1 guy and Dempsey was bigger in height
and reach.
Ray
Comment
-
Interim, super, silver, regular, emeritus, diamond...
Is that all? We could do better than that. There are not enough champions, is the problem. Make a new division every two pounds, then we will have the champions we deserve. Every fight should be between champions. Why watch mere contenders tussle? We can find titles for some of these guys. C'mon, even club fighters with losing records deserve some kind of title. Let's give 'em one, so they can fight on with the pride of a champ. Bust out the ruby and saphire belts, you stingy orgs. The fire opal belt. The oldtimers belt. The seniors' tour champion. Where is the platinum belt? Where is the belt for fastest hands in the division? We have a ways to go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Old LefHook View PostInterim, super, silver, regular, emeritus, diamond...
Is that all? We could do better than that. There are not enough champions, is the problem. Make a new division every two pounds, then we will have the champions we deserve. Every fight should be between champions. Why watch mere contenders tussle? We can find titles for some of these guys. C'mon, even club fighters with losing records deserve some kind of title. Let's give 'em one, so they can fight on with the pride of a champ. Bust out the ruby and saphire belts, you stingy orgs. The fire opal belt. The oldtimers belt. The seniors' tour champion. Where is the platinum belt? Where is the belt for fastest hands in the division? We have a ways to go.
We're a lot, and I mean A LOT, that are totally fed up with how the sanctioning bodies have been, and are, allowed to dictate boxing.
But, who allowed them to take charge of the sport? I don't blame the sanctioning bodies as much as I blame the later generation of boxing journalists. Because if the latter had stand up against the alphabet organization's stupidity, which has turned the sport of boxing into ridicule with this unlimited portions of 'world champions', we wouldn't have had the situation we have today.
During the 1980s, former Ring editor Bert Sugar fought a war on the mag's editorial page against the devious WBC, WBA and IBF – at times leading to The Ring being barred from enter some events – the kind of independent, brave journalism I'd wish we would see today.
No discredit to today's boxers, though. They're as game as their forerunners.Last edited by Ben Bolt; 02-28-2015, 06:28 PM.
Comment
Comment