Anyone care to maybe compare Gradovich facial damage in comparison to Kevin Mitchells?
See which one of the two was worse, lol.
I snapped a shot of Kevin but never got one of Gradovich but I know his face wasn't anywhere near as bad as Kevins was but for some reason they seemed sympathetic towards the stoppage of Kevin, strange that?
Not a troll thread just a case of comparing the bias that is shown towards matchroom (skysports) boxers i.e. the complete agreeance that Gradovich should have been stopped because of his facial injuries but the remorse they showed to Mitchell for some reason because he is promoted by them...
As boxing fans shouldn't we be calling out companies for that, I'm personally sick of this bias shown towards promoted fighters I just wish we could get commentary that is unbiased and called with their own opinion which isn't influenced by nationality.
See which one of the two was worse, lol.
I snapped a shot of Kevin but never got one of Gradovich but I know his face wasn't anywhere near as bad as Kevins was but for some reason they seemed sympathetic towards the stoppage of Kevin, strange that?
Not a troll thread just a case of comparing the bias that is shown towards matchroom (skysports) boxers i.e. the complete agreeance that Gradovich should have been stopped because of his facial injuries but the remorse they showed to Mitchell for some reason because he is promoted by them...
As boxing fans shouldn't we be calling out companies for that, I'm personally sick of this bias shown towards promoted fighters I just wish we could get commentary that is unbiased and called with their own opinion which isn't influenced by nationality.
Comment