Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Moonbat liberalunatic Demorat Pete Stark says Constitution has no meaning

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    After all you fukers are too free,

    Comment


    • #12
      Apparently one only has first amendment rights if they agree with you. He's entitled to his opinion, even if it is wrong.

      " The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday the federal government has the power to keep some sex offenders behind bars indefinitely after they have served their sentences "

      That bothers me. It seems like a slippery slope.
      Most of the people who are afraid of the scaaaary New World Order are in favour of the death penalty. Is that a slippery slope towards executing minor property criminals? The slippery slope argument is a fallacy considering that most public order laws depend on drawing a line somewhere.

      Having said that I am inclined to agree that if you want to deal with safety issues regarding the release of offenders you have to look at the fundamentals of sentencing, not simply add laws that allow you to change the rules after the event.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
        The American goverment probably notice how China has it people under control and is prospering and doing well economically.
        Only the coastal elites in china are doing well. The rest of the country is living in poverty.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
          After all you fukers are too free,
          Yeah that's a good point,

          But Mack is right about people having their sentences extended because of legislation. That's just ridiculous.

          They served their time and it doesn't make sense to punish people on a whim.



          Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Saucy Jacky View Post
            Only the coastal elites in china are doing well. The rest of the country is living in poverty.
            right but they manage to move a good amount of their citizens out of poverty

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
              The American goverment probably notice how China has it people under control and is prospering and doing well economically.
              LOL you really think that China is prospering? Do you really think a communist country would tell the truth about their numbers?

              The only time China does well anyway is the aspect of allowing some capitalism in its country

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
                right but they manage to move a good amount of their citizens out of poverty
                The country on a hold is doing well to they took away most of American manufacturing jobs, example: the ipods and apple products that you Americans love so much is manufactured by them

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by ILLuminato View Post
                  LOL you really think that China is prospering? Do you really think a communist country would tell the truth about their numbers?

                  The only time China does well anyway is the aspect of allowing some capitalism in its country
                  The people might not be doing well individually but the country itself is very powerful just surpassed Japan to be the number 2 economy, will soon overtake you Americans to be number 1.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    This is an nwo minion that is doing all the dirty work...

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                      Apparently one only has first amendment rights if they agree with you. He's entitled to his opinion, even if it is wrong.



                      Most of the people who are afraid of the scaaaary New World Order are in favour of the death penalty. Is that a slippery slope towards executing minor property criminals? The slippery slope argument is a fallacy considering that most public order laws depend on drawing a line somewhere.

                      Having said that I am inclined to agree that if you want to deal with safety issues regarding the release of offenders you have to look at the fundamentals of sentencing, not simply add laws that allow you to change the rules after the event.
                      The difference being that people who are being executed knew the penalties of their actions when the crime was committed. They didnt murder someone with the understanding that they would receive 15 years in the penitentiary and the government decide the death penalty would be a more appropriate punishment once they were incarcerated. Anytime the government pushes the envelope encroaching on peoples personal rights its a slippery slope.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP