Originally posted by MindBat
View Post
It insulted my intelligence to be honest. It was set out like an academic lecture, yet contained nothing of substance. The 2 lines I previously quoted where ridiculous. There is no place for phrases like "in opposition to spiritual law" in a supposedly academic lecture. And that was just the beginning the "lecture" got worse. It was all pseudo science, hippy philosophising and conspiracy ramblings.
The most annoying thing is that sensible arguments should be made about energy companies wielding too much power and sustainable enenerg not being utilised enough. But bubblegum presentations suchP as these actually destract from the debate not add to it.
Comment