Lomachenko is a special fighter.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Yeah, when a guy is unifying against a pretty good fighter and dominating without looking at his best but is heavily critiqued for losing maybe 3 rounds you know those critics expect even more than his fans and think he's a special fighter without wanting to admit as much.

Imagine how bad people would be saying Whitaker is when he was barely cracking anyone at 147 and losing rounds in fights.

Lomachenko is a great fighter and IMO one of only three that are currently boxing that I could honestly say that about. Lomachenko, Crawford, Usyk. Inoue could be the fourth it appears he has that talent ceiling but is far behind technically right now.

Well Whitaker was past his prime in a lot of his notable fights at '47, second they wouldn't be as critical of Whitaker because he was so much better than Lomachenko.

And no, Lomachenko is NOT a great fighter, that word gets thrown around too loosely around here.

[chrisJS]

Well Whitaker was past his prime in a lot of his notable fights at '47, second they wouldn't be as critical of Whitaker because he was so much better than Lomachenko.

And no, Lomachenko is NOT a great fighter, that word gets thrown around too loosely around here.

Whitaker lost rounds at 135 too. Paez took rounds off him and others too.

[BLASTER1]

The funny thing is now people are certain that Davis beats mediocre Loma after that pathetic showing.
Lol. Even Davis doesn't agree with that.