Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

    If you look at Hopkins MW title wins and the natural MWs who he fought (not eithers losses), so that means not De La Hoya or Trinidad who were naturally smaller fighters, but the Joppys, Holmes, Echoles etc

    Then look at Sturms MW title wins consisting of -
    B Schenk former WBO MW champ
    J Castillo WBA MW champ
    S Sylvester former IBF MW champ became champ after losing to Sturm

    plus other names -
    H Cherifi past his best former WBC MW champ
    G Lorenzo alledged future Pavlik opponent
    K Gevor title challenger at MW & SMW
    K Sato (undefeated)
    R Griffin
    J Pittman (undefeated)
    N G Alcoba (undefeated)
    M Maseo
    R Varon
    H J Velazco

    You find that their MW resumes arent as far apart as people would like you to believe.
    We know Hopkins has a problem dealing with fast 2 handed fighters, losing to Jones, Taylor and Calzaghe, and Sturm is a fast 2 handed fighter

    So who would win at MW Hopkins or Sturm?
    Last edited by SergioMaravilla; 09-11-2012, 04:36 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by SergioMaravilla View Post
    If you look at Hopkins MW title wins and the natural MWs who he fought (not eithers losses), so that means not De La Hoya or Trinidad who were naturally smaller fighters, but the Joppys, Holmes, Echoles etc
    So Tito doesn't count because he was too small but Joppy, whom Tito destroyed in 5, counts?

    Comment


    • #3
      another thing, hopkins decided to fight the loser of de la hoya- sturm

      Comment


      • #4
        Is this a serious question?

        Comment


        • #5
          Hopkins didnt loose for 10 years at middleweight and fought everyone that was there to fight. Sturms reign is on its way to 10 years and in that time consists of a KO loss, a gift decision and him outright avoiding major names that passed through the division such at Taylor, Winky, Pavlik, Williams and Sergio.

          When there were no names at 160, Hopkins fought guys coming up and then moved up in weight himself to make the big fights with Tarver, Pavlik, Dawson, Winky, Pascal and Calzaghe.

          You really have to go out on a limb to even compare them which is why you want to throw out the Trinidad middleweight win even though it was a middleweight defense after trinidad KOed a full size middleweight his last fight. Theres no reason to believe trinidad couldnt KO some of those guys with less than 20 fights that Sturm has been fighting.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by razor.thin View Post
            another thing, hopkins decided to fight the loser of de la hoya- sturm
            tell me one fighter in the world who wouldnt fight de la hoya over sturm. ill wait

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by razor.thin View Post
              another thing, hopkins decided to fight the loser of de la hoya- sturm

              Exactly, when Sturm would have been the much better win

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jayjames616 View Post
                Is this a serious question?
                I'm with this guy.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Obviously Hopkins.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    lol. tito was going through divisions. for some ****ed up, incredibly deluded reason, he had his eyes set on roy. he counts.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP