Originally posted by j.razor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Isn't Impressed With What He Has Done This Year
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post1) Who are the "ELITE LEVEL" professionals that lost in the Olympics you were talking about?
2) I brought up Verdejo because a poster pointed out that Loma beat Verdejo in the Olympics, as a statement of Loma's great accomplishment, even though Loma was 24 and Verdejo was 19. Henry Tillman beat Tyson twice as amateurs, and got destroyed in the pros; 2:47 in the 1st!
3) Cuban and Soviet men are now fighting in the pros, not like in the 70s and 80s! Maybe you're to young to remember! If you're a 25+ year old Cuban/Soviet Amateur (See Teofilo Stevenson) fighting an 18/19 yr. old American, I expect you to win!
4) Lastly, Lom's dad kept Loma in the amateurs, because he didn't think he was ready, not because the best boxers in the world were amateurs! Floyd kept Davis away from Loma because he doesn't think he's ready for Loma yet. Why is one thing good, and the other bad!
If you don't like African-Americans, I would highly suggest you follow a different sport! Hockey or Skiing may be more to you're liking! Fu*king racist!
2) If anything, doesn't it mean certain fighters are better amateurs than pros and some are better pros than amateurs?
3) That's my point, you made Lomachenko's amateur achievements look like he beat a few kids. No, he beat the best MEN out there.
4) You might think so but it's not true. Amateur boxing has a much higher priority in Eastern Europe than it has in the US. Fighting as an amateur doesn't mean you're not ready for the pros yet. Keep repeating yourself like a broken record, it's not true.
And lastly, why am I the racist now? You're trying to play the race card after being called out for having a racist agenda? You're an idiot and a racist.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheUntouchable View Post1) Hassan N'Dam N'Jikam, 2x middleweight champion of the world, once before going to Rio, once after. And Amnat Ruenroeng, long reigning flyweight champion.
2) If anything, doesn't it mean certain fighters are better amateurs than pros and some are better pros than amateurs?
3) That's my point, you made Lomachenko's amateur achievements look like he beat a few kids. No, he beat the best MEN out there.
4) You might think so but it's not true. Amateur boxing has a much higher priority in Eastern Europe than it has in the US. Fighting as an amateur doesn't mean you're not ready for the pros yet. Keep repeating yourself like a broken record, it's not true.
And lastly, why am I the racist now? You're trying to play the race card after being called out for having a racist agenda? You're an idiot and a racist.
Loma is a great talent, but he wasn't facing the BEST when he was fighting in the Amateurs! Were they wearing headgear in 2012? Were they fighting 10-rounds? Do you get points for body attack? The entire scoring system for amateurs is way different than in the amateurs!
Like I said, Henry Tillman beat Tyson twice in the amateurs, KO'd in the 1st, by Tyson in the pros! Mayweather, no gold in the Olympics, no losses in the pros! Do you think Serafim Todorov was better than Mayweather? Holyfield lost to Kevin Barry of New Zealand! So he was "THE BEST?"
No one is taking away from Loma's achievements, and it was even the point of the thread you jumped in on! The question was "why is Floyd protecting Davis from Loma?" So basically, it's Okay to stay in the amateurs until 24, but if a 23 year old isn't ready to face a Top 5 P4P fighter, he's a DUCK! That's a double standard I can't support! And again, that has nothing to do with my race or ethnicity!
Comment
-
Originally posted by j.razor View PostGTFOH! I gave him his props! And just cuz you FINALLY won a "prediction" don't mean **** cuz your like a boxer with a 1-30 record....lol
You didn't give props and claimed fix and made tons of excuses despite saying none of it mattered and that Rigo dominates and can only lose by robbery.
Comment
-
Comment