So when a fighter says 154-168 is easy to make and fans would like to see him at 168 they are supposedly haters. Because the compubox is so convincing given the strategically selected opponents...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG has "no skills doe" yet he's consistently among the top 3 on compubox plus/minus
Collapse
-
-
I thought Compubox was irrelevant?
He doesn't get hit often because when he hits most of the jokers he fights they go into survival mode.
Anyone with a working eye can see his defense isn't good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cammoking123 View PostLara, Trout, Cotto, Angulo, Kirkland. It's pretty decent. A lot better than Golokin's
Kirkland? Ishida finished him quicker than Canelo. Kirkland could be dangerous on his day but those days were long gone. He was totally finished and inactive when Canelo fought him.
Augulo was a punching bag by that point.
Trout and Cotto are good wins though. The Trout fight was close but a good win, probably similar to GGG's win over Joacobs. Cotto's best days were well behind him but he wasn't shot, so any win over Cotto that still has something left is good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop View PostSo when a fighter says 154-168 is easy to make and fans would like to see him at 168 they are supposedly haters. Because the compubox is so convincing given the strategically selected opponents...
It all ends Sept 16th.
Comment
-
-
What Golovkin did to Lemieux, Stevens, Monroe and Murray convinced me there's no one at 160 that can beat him. Jacobs hung in there with him but still lost. Canelo's only shot IMHO is to outbox Golovkin and win on points. I still feel that once Golovkin touches Canelo all bets are off.
Comment
Comment