Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What it would take for Thurman to be considered a hall of famer/ATG?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by BIG GUNZ View Post
    Having wins over Porter, Garcia, Spence, Brook, Pacquiao & Bradley is an extremely good resume. Pacquiao isn't washed up at all, he's still a legit top 3 welterweight even at 38. And Bradley is still a top 5 welterweight.
    EXTREMELY GOOD? lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    I won't even bother reading what you said after that, it's not worthy of a response it's so stupid. If you actually consider Pac a top 2 WW we are done here. Not even in his prime was he 1 or 2.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
      EXTREMELY GOOD? lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


      I won't even bother reading what you said after that, it's not worthy of a response it's so stupid. If you actually consider Pac a top 2 WW we are done here. Not even in his prime was he 1 or 2.
      lol seriously? Pacquiao wasn't one of the top 2 welterweights at any time in his career? lmao he was called the fighter of the decade of the 2000s. You just seem like you're biased towards him & don't give him credit.

      And who's ahead of him currently outside of maybe Brook & Thurman? Spence hasn't done enough yet. Garcia just lost & arguably lost 2 or 3 times already. Khan hasn't barely done anything at welterweight. He beat Bradley 3 times. Porter has 2 or 3 decent wins at best & lost in his last fight. Who else is there where Pacquiao isn't at the least in the top 3 currently?
      Last edited by BIG GUNZ; 03-14-2017, 01:12 AM.

      Comment


      • #23
        He has the mentality, boxing skills, and lifestyle of someone you'd think would end up as a HOF'er. It really depends on the writers, they're very bi-polar about who gets in and who doesn't. It's resume? it's fame? How many wins can you have, how many losses, etc. There's no real criteria. It's based on the bi-polar panel.

        Comment


        • #24
          He cant do nothing. Thurman is not HOF let alone ATG material.

          You kids and noobs nowadays get too excited for nothing.

          Thurman is nothing special

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by BIG GUNZ View Post
            lol seriously? Pacquiao wasn't one of the top 2 welterweights at any time in his career? lmao he was called the fighter of the decade of the 2000s. You just seem like you're biased towards him & don't give him credit.
            Yeah Loaded has a biased hatred of Pacquiao.

            Comment


            • #26
              Anyhow, as for the thread topic, I think Keith has a shot at making the hall, but he'll never be an ATG.

              His wins over Porter and Danny were nice but far from spectacular. And ATG's don't give rounds away by hopping on a ten speed bicycle and riding laps around the ring to avoid danger. ATG's step on the gas and put their opponents away.

              Comment


              • #27
                Garcia+Porter; Peterson, Spence, Brook, Crawford, Canelo, Pacquiao, 154lb title would do it for me.

                That would be an amazing resume. That's if he beats them all.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Tenure would help. Thurman has been consistently good. Won fights, many if them great matchups. He has not been extremely spectacular but he has been very consistent. If he keeps it up it will happen. At this point he just need to continue.
                  Last edited by TBear; 03-14-2017, 04:04 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Or he could just beat king Khan and slide right into home base...ATG status confirmed

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Even the 2 best fighters of the previous era ducked that shete

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP