Originally posted by Mr. Punch-Out!!
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post1. Why don't you learn how to consistently use the quote function so that this dialogue goes more smoothly, unless you are trying to avoid me.
2. How the hell did I back up what you just said? You said he gave diluted urine after the IV. I clearly showed you that in their rule book, he is not allowed to give diluted urine after rehydrating.
Please work on your comprehension skills, "dickhead."
So do you admit you were wrong and giving false information now?
Comment
-
7.3
Insufficient
Sample
Volume
If an
Athlete
is unable to provide 90 mL of urine, the
DCO
follows this sequence of
actions:
1.
Advises the
Athlete
that the partial
Sample
provided shall be secured and a
further
Sample
or
Samples
collected until a
Suitable
Volume for Urine
Analysis
is provided.
2.
Instructs the
Athlete
to select partial
Sample
Collection Equipment
, as per
Guidelines
Section 6.1.
Recommended:
Provide the
Athlete
with at
least 3 partial
Sample Collection
kits
from which to select.
3.
Instructs the
Athlete
to open the relevant equipment, pour the insufficient
Sample
into the new container (unless the
Sample
Collection Authority’s
procedures permit retention of the insufficient
Sample
in the original
collection vessel), and seal it as directed by the
DCO
.
4.
In full view of the
Athlete
, checks that the container (or original collection
vessel, if applicable) has been properly sealed.
5.
With the
Athlete
, checks that the equipment code number, the volume and
identity of the insufficient
Sample
are recorded
accurately on the
Doping
Cont
rol
form
.
6.
With the
Athlete
,
initials or signs the
Doping Control
form to show both are
satisfied with the temporary sealing procedure.
The
Athlete
then return to the waiting area, and remains under continuous
observation until
ready to provide a further
Sample
.
Subject to the color or the initial
T
esting
of any residue of the
Athlete’s
partial urine
Sample
, the
Athlete
should be advised if further hydration is appropriate or not
,
to
avoid providing a
Sample
that doesn’t have a
Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis
.
Either the
Athlete
or the
DCO
retains control of the
Sample
.
The
DCO
ensures that the sealed partial
Sample
is securely stored under continuous
observation or in a secure area within the
Doping Control
Station
.If
the
Athlete
retains control of the
Sample
, he/she must remain with the partial
Sample
within the
Doping Control
Station
, under the continuous observation of
Sample
Collection Personnel
.
When the
Athlete
is ready to provide more urine, the
Sample
provision
process is
repeated until the
DCO
is satisfied that
Suitable Volume for Urine Analysis
has been
met by combining the subsequent
Sample/s
with
the stored partial
Sample
.
To ensure process continuity and for the
Athlete’s
comfort, the same
Witness
of the
in
itial attempt is used if possible. However, a change of
Witness
in no way affects
process integrity.
The
Athlete
selects a new
Sample
collection vessel each time he/she attempts to
pass an additional
Sample
.
Once the
Athlete
has provided a further
Sample,
the
DCO
asks the
Athlete
to
inspect the container used to temporarily store his/her their partial
Sample
, to
ensure the seals are secure and consistent with the information recorded on the
Doping Control
form.
Any irregularities in seal integrity
are recorded by the
DCO
, either
on the
Doping
Control
form or in a separate report to the
Sample
Collection Authority
, and
investigated according to ISTI Annex A
-
Investigating a
Possible
Failure to Comply
.
The
DCO
then directs the
Athlete
to remove/break
the seal of the partial
Sample
container(s) and combine the
Sample
with the partial
Sample
until the desired
volume is reached or, if additional volume is available, until the maximum level of
the
Sample
c
ollection vessel is reached.
I
f a subsequent
Sampl
e
provided by the
Athlete
looks more diluted than the
Sample
stored in the partial
Sample
kit
, the
DCO
is to advise
the
Athlete
to pour
only the
amount
of urine required
to meet the
Suitable Volume for Analysis
.
Otherwise there is a risk that the specific gravity of the
Sample
may be reduced to
a
n unacceptable
level
,
which then require
s
the
Athlete
to provide an additional
Sample
or
Samples
.
Once a minimum of 90 mL of urine or greater is collected, th
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostIt clearly say also that IV is a prohibited method that should only be given under specific conditions, none of with floyd met,
Originally posted by Shape up View Postit also says that only 50ml per 6 hours is allowed, another part floyd ignored,
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the part where usada gave a tue with no authority as the NSAC stated,
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the fact floyd had only lost 2lb in 2 weeks so he could not have been more than slightly dehydrated,
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the fact he didn't mention it on his pre fight medical questionaire,
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the fact no doctors name has been put forward as to who authorised the IV,
The purpose of the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information (ISPPPI) is to ensure that all relevant parties involved in anti-doping in sport adhere to a set of minimum privacy protections when collecting and using athlete personal information, such as information relating to whereabouts, doping controls, and therapeutic use exemptions (TUE).
USADA adheres to the WADA ISPPPI.
http://www.usada.org/testing/results/athlete-privacy/
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the fact there was reps for the NSAC everywhere on fight night yet nothing was mentioned about the IV,
Originally posted by Shape up View Posthow about the fact that on fight night the NSAC and usada were discussing pacquaios possible injection but usada didn't find it nessaccary to inform the NSAC of floyds IV arter the weigh in,
Originally posted by Shape up View Postso many things were wrong with what happened but dickheads like you stick your head in the sand and try to justify what he did, if it was pacquaio that had the IV you would all be saying you knew he was a drug cheat, yet floyd actually did it and he's innocent, your a dickhead
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View Post7.3
Insufficient
Sample
Volume
If an
Athlete
is unable to provide 90 mL of urine, the
DCO
follows this sequence of
actions:
1.
Advises the
Athlete
that the partial
Sample
provided shall be secured and a
further
Sample
or
Samples
collected until a
Suitable
Volume for Urine
Analysis
is provided.
2.
Instructs the
Athlete
to select partial
Sample
Collection Equipment
, as per
Guidelines
Section 6.1.
Recommended:
Provide the
Athlete
with at
least 3 partial
Sample Collection
kits
from which to select.
3.
Instructs the
Athlete
to open the relevant equipment, pour the insufficient
Sample
into the new container (unless the
Sample
Collection Authority’s
procedures permit retention of the insufficient
Sample
in the original
collection vessel), and seal it as directed by the
DCO
.
4.
In full view of the
Athlete
, checks that the container (or original collection
vessel, if applicable) has been properly sealed.
5.
With the
Athlete
, checks that the equipment code number, the volume and
identity of the insufficient
Sample
are recorded
accurately on the
Doping
Cont
rol
form
.
6.
With the
Athlete
,
initials or signs the
Doping Control
form to show both are
satisfied with the temporary sealing procedure.
The
Athlete
then return to the waiting area, and remains under continuous
observation until
ready to provide a further
Sample
.
Subject to the color or the initial
T
esting
of any residue of the
Athlete’s
partial urine
Sample
, the
Athlete
should be advised if further hydration is appropriate or not
,
to
avoid providing a
Sample
that doesn’t have a
Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis
.
Either the
Athlete
or the
DCO
retains control of the
Sample
.
The
DCO
ensures that the sealed partial
Sample
is securely stored under continuous
observation or in a secure area within the
Doping Control
Station
.If
the
Athlete
retains control of the
Sample
, he/she must remain with the partial
Sample
within the
Doping Control
Station
, under the continuous observation of
Sample
Collection Personnel
.
When the
Athlete
is ready to provide more urine, the
Sample
provision
process is
repeated until the
DCO
is satisfied that
Suitable Volume for Urine Analysis
has been
met by combining the subsequent
Sample/s
with
the stored partial
Sample
.
To ensure process continuity and for the
Athlete’s
comfort, the same
Witness
of the
in
itial attempt is used if possible. However, a change of
Witness
in no way affects
process integrity.
The
Athlete
selects a new
Sample
collection vessel each time he/she attempts to
pass an additional
Sample
.
Once the
Athlete
has provided a further
Sample,
the
DCO
asks the
Athlete
to
inspect the container used to temporarily store his/her their partial
Sample
, to
ensure the seals are secure and consistent with the information recorded on the
Doping Control
form.
Any irregularities in seal integrity
are recorded by the
DCO
, either
on the
Doping
Control
form or in a separate report to the
Sample
Collection Authority
, and
investigated according to ISTI Annex A
-
Investigating a
Possible
Failure to Comply
.
The
DCO
then directs the
Athlete
to remove/break
the seal of the partial
Sample
container(s) and combine the
Sample
with the partial
Sample
until the desired
volume is reached or, if additional volume is available, until the maximum level of
the
Sample
c
ollection vessel is reached.
I
f a subsequent
Sampl
e
provided by the
Athlete
looks more diluted than the
Sample
stored in the partial
Sample
kit
, the
DCO
is to advise
the
Athlete
to pour
only the
amount
of urine required
to meet the
Suitable Volume for Analysis
.
Otherwise there is a risk that the specific gravity of the
Sample
may be reduced to
a
n unacceptable
level
,
which then require
s
the
Athlete
to provide an additional
Sample
or
Samples
.
Once a minimum of 90 mL of urine or greater is collected, th
Oh what the hell. I'll post it up for you.
7.4.11 The DCO shall confirm that the Sample meets the requirements for analysis, as specified by the ADO in accordance with the laboratory standards, by testing the residual volume of urine remaining in the collection vessel for specific gravity (greater than or equal to 1.005 if using a refractometer, or 1.010 with lab sticks. Reagent strips and/or a refractometer may be used.
So um....give up now? LMAO! You just bodied yourself, clown!
Comment
-
Bennett said unless the IV was administered at a hospital, it needs to be cleared by filing a therapeutic-use exemption, or TUE, and supporting documents through the Nevada commission and authorized by the commission’s medical expert.
“He cannot have it done at his house and [USADA] can’t authorize it.... I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a therapeutic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada,” Bennett said. “USADA never told us prior to the IV that they had their own TUE, and they never kept us informed about it being administered.
“If they think they can do what they want, where and whenever they want in the state of Nevada, they are grossly mistaken.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostBennett said unless the IV was administered at a hospital, it needs to be cleared by filing a therapeutic-use exemption, or TUE, and supporting documents through the Nevada commission and authorized by the commission’s medical expert.
“He cannot have it done at his house and [USADA] can’t authorize it.... I have specifically articulated and memorialized to USADA that [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a therapeutic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada,” Bennett said. “USADA never told us prior to the IV that they had their own TUE, and they never kept us informed about it being administered.
“If they think they can do what they want, where and whenever they want in the state of Nevada, they are grossly mistaken.”
Bennett said he has no concerns Mayweather was working to mask drug use, saying the boxer “has always been an advocate of drug testing and has set a fine example for all fighters.”
Comment
Comment