Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

mcgregor is mayweathers defining fight....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mcgregor is mayweathers defining fight....

    Floyd mayweather is a hell of a fighter with god gifted skills, and despite what some people say hes packing a solid CV.

    However, being the self proclaimed 'TBE', we are judging floyd at the highest of standards.

    FLoyd had the chance to achieve something special, and use the 50th fight by coming out of 'retirement' and fighting a world class, dangerous opponent in there prime. This would have put the exclamation on an excellent career. This would have been something people would have talked about for many years, how he came out and beat the best active fighter. Further proof of mayweathers greatness.

    However floyd picked the easy option, an even easier opponent than andre berto.

    Hes chosen a fighter with a 0-0 boxing record and chosen to make a mockery of the sport, a slap in the face for many.

    So perhaps this fight is a defining one, in the sense that rather than going with the hardest option and looking to really achieve greatness, hes gone for a soft touch in a joke/circus fight and undoubtedly chosen the easy option.

    We can talk about mayweather being money orientated and hes picked the cash fight, but by calling himself 'the best ever' surely he does place an importance on legacy?

    What do others think? Does this fight impact negatively on floyd and is it characteristic of a career where 'safety first' has been mayweathers mantra, both in his fighting style and choice of opponents?

  • #2
    its his first in prime hall of fame level opponent.....

    from another sport.

    Comment


    • #3
      lol how the fuk is this a negative? 50-0 means jack shlt.. its just prettier than 49-0.. its not some end all be all record

      his legacy has been solidified, fighting a thumran or danny garcia wouldnt have changed anything, hes 40 yrs old. People would not have "talked about it for many years" you all would complain like every other guy hes beat

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
        Floyd mayweather is a hell of a fighter with god gifted skills, and despite what some people say hes packing a solid CV.

        However, being the self proclaimed 'TBE', we are judging floyd at the highest of standards.

        FLoyd had the chance to achieve something special, and use the 50th fight by coming out of 'retirement' and fighting a world class, dangerous opponent in there prime. This would have put the exclamation on an excellent career. This would have been something people would have talked about for many years, how he came out and beat the best active fighter. Further proof of mayweathers greatness.

        However floyd picked the easy option, an even easier opponent than andre berto.

        Hes chosen a fighter with a 0-0 boxing record and chosen to make a mockery of the sport, a slap in the face for many.

        So perhaps this fight is a defining one, in the sense that rather than going with the hardest option and looking to really achieve greatness, hes gone for a soft touch in a joke/circus fight and undoubtedly chosen the easy option.

        We can talk about mayweather being money orientated and hes picked the cash fight, but by calling himself 'the best ever' surely he does place an importance on legacy?

        What do others think? Does this fight impact negatively on floyd and is it characteristic of a career where 'safety first' has been mayweathers mantra, both in his fighting style and choice of opponents?
        Yaaawwwwn. The best thing about the Floyd/Conor fight has been watching his detractors vent their frustration.

        I get that you are upset that he has made a lot of money while ridiculing and defeating guys you like. I get you are upset that he gets voted top 10-15 of all time. I get you hate that he is bigger than the sport.

        What I don't get is why you and others continually come up with these weird and illogical ways of measuring his career just because you don't like him. What do you get out of that?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
          Yaaawwwwn. The best thing about the Floyd/Conor fight has been watching his detractors vent their frustration.

          I get that you are upset that he has made a lot of money while ridiculing and defeating guys you like. I get you are upset that he gets voted top 10-15 of all time. I get you hate that he is bigger than the sport.

          What I don't get is why you and others continually come up with these weird and illogical ways of measuring his career just because you don't like him. What do you get out of that?
          What do you get out of slurping his dong and taking up for him? Does "Monkey" Mayweather send you a check or something? "peeleft:

          Comment


          • #6
            Just stop it. The dude's fought like 26 world champions and that's not enough for you? If he fought Thurman you trolls would be like "But he ducked McGregor, his legacy would've been complete if he beat the best UFC fighter to go along with all the best boxers as well". He's been dominating since the 90's what more do you want at this point? The guy's beat a who's who of top fighters over 20 years.

            Last edited by JK1700; 07-25-2017, 12:41 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by LockardTheGOAT View Post
              What do you get out of slurping his dong and taking up for him? Does "Monkey" Mayweather send you a check or something? "peeleft:
              why do you call responding to this thread "slurping his dong" and taking up for him? Is there a rule against having a different opinion?

              I also notice every time guys like you criticize Floyd fans you do so with a ****sexual related slur. What is it with posters that don't like Floyd and your penchant for mentioning dick sucking and other ****sexual acts? Added a racial slur as well.

              You seem to have some real issues.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sterling Archer View Post
                its his first in prime hall of fame level opponent.....

                from another sport.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by GriffTannen View Post
                  lol how the fuk is this a negative? 50-0 means jack shlt.. its just prettier than 49-0.. its not some end all be all record

                  his legacy has been solidified, fighting a thumran or danny garcia wouldnt have changed anything, hes 40 yrs old. People would not have "talked about it for many years" you all would complain like every other guy hes beat
                  he could have given us a fight to remember and look forward to. instead he brings shame to the sport, his parting gift.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    you are a GGG supporter right??? GGG's defining moment is fighting a guy Floyd toyed with

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP