Crawford should be ranked ahead of GGG p4p right?

[b00g13man]

I don't see a problem with that.

[g27region]

Yes, Crawford is a way better boxer

[RussB23]

Of course he fought better opposition.

[BOXEO _]

Yup, Crawford's clearly the best at 140 and he was clearly the best at 135.

[BOXEO _]

Will Lampley put him ahead of Golovkin on the Gatti list tho?????

[Godsfly]

yes yes and yes..........

[Redd Foxx]

I think he's likely a more talented fighter, and his win over Postol is far more valuable than anything Golovkin has done (or is likely to do at this rate).
However, Crawford needs at least one more big win or a couple of fairly good ones for me to place him above Golovkin on the p4p list.
Golovkin may fight trash, but there's a consistent and volume that counts for something.

[richardt]

I feel that Crawford should be near the top and GGG closer to the bottom of PFP. GGG needs a signature win.

[Kagami Taiga]

At this point, how is it even arguable?

[Raonic]

I have GGG ahead still, even after today, but I wouldn't complain if someone had TC ahead of GGG.