I've not watched the video, nor have I posted anything about this fight yet.... nor have I rewatched it since watching it live.... I wasn't really scoring it live... just semi-scoring it and enjoying it.... and I said at the end of the fight "I wouldn't argue with a draw". However - it is clear to me that Canelo won at least 4 of the first 6.... so it isn't hard to give him 2 or 3 of the last 6.... so how people are going nuts about this decision is beyond me.... it's totally fair and I think if you are arguing who 'more likely' won... I'd favour Canelo for the early rounds. GGG left it too late and didn't have great championship rounds either.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canelo won Round 5 clearly! Not a close round
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by harwri008 View PostI'm curious, how does this computer count punches? Are there sensors anywhere on any equipment or on the boxers that count punches? Or is a human being siting there hitting a button whenever they see a punch landing.
Each operator takes one fighter. So if that 1 person can't see because they are blocked they could completely miss a 6 punch combo that landed. You also are at the mercy of 2 different perceptions. If one judge is counting any graze as landing and they get assigned GGG then you can have wildly different stats from what really happened.
What they should do is randomize the rounds. Say operator 1 gets GGG for rounds 2,4,6,7,8, and 11 and gets Canelo for rounds 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, and 12. That would normalize some of the variance. I guess that might be too confusing though.
So if Canelo gets assigned a Compubox operator that only counts super clean punches as landing his numbers could be way low compared to the more liberal operator on the other side.
I think someone had a good thread about round 1 where the operator who was assigned GGG said he landed 15 punches when there is no way he landed more than 7 or 8.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny2x2x View PostIt's 2 guys watching the fight with 4 buttons each. jab landed, jab missed, power punch landed, power punch missed.
Each operator takes one fighter. So if that 1 person can't see because they are blocked they could completely miss a 6 punch combo that landed. You also are at the mercy of 2 different perceptions. If one judge is counting any graze as landing and they get assigned GGG then you can have wildly different stats from what really happened.
What they should do is randomize the rounds. Say operator 1 gets GGG for rounds 2,4,6,7,8, and 11 and gets Canelo for rounds 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, and 12. That would normalize some of the variance. I guess that might be too confusing though.
So if Canelo gets assigned a Compubox operator that only counts super clean punches as landing his numbers could be way low compared to the more liberal operator on the other side.
I think someone had a good thread about round 1 where the operator who was assigned GGG said he landed 15 punches when there is no way he landed more than 7 or 8.
I already said the stats were skewed in favor of Golovkin. I do think he landed more punches but I don't think it was at the rate they were counting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by craigus1990 View PostI've not watched the video, nor have I posted anything about this fight yet.... nor have I rewatched it since watching it live.... I wasn't really scoring it live... just semi-scoring it and enjoying it.... and I said at the end of the fight "I wouldn't argue with a draw". However - it is clear to me that Canelo won at least 4 of the first 6.... so it isn't hard to give him 2 or 3 of the last 6.... so how people are going nuts about this decision is beyond me.... it's totally fair and I think if you are arguing who 'more likely' won... I'd favour Canelo for the early rounds. GGG left it too late and didn't have great championship rounds either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by harwri008 View PostIf you're correct then there's always room for human error. There's also no way you can guarantee neutrality.
I already said the stats were skewed in favor of Golovkin. I do think he landed more punches but I don't think it was at the rate they were counting.
And just like most fans, what if a particular compubox judge largely ignored body work? That can dramatically effect the pinch count.
My thought is that there are a data point, but sometime can be way way off. Just as often though I bet they are pretty accurate.Last edited by Johnny2x2x; 09-20-2017, 10:44 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by craigus1990 View PostI've not watched the video, nor have I posted anything about this fight yet.... nor have I rewatched it since watching it live.... I wasn't really scoring it live... just semi-scoring it and enjoying it.... and I said at the end of the fight "I wouldn't argue with a draw". However - it is clear to me that Canelo won at least 4 of the first 6.... so it isn't hard to give him 2 or 3 of the last 6.... so how people are going nuts about this decision is beyond me.... it's totally fair and I think if you are arguing who 'more likely' won... I'd favour Canelo for the early rounds. GGG left it too late and didn't have great championship rounds either.Originally posted by j.razor View PostYou have harold ledderman & jim lampley to thank for that. Low I.Q.'s listen to them instead of actually paying attention & watching a fight round by round.
Comment
Comment