Originally posted by Box-Office
View Post
Even if Taylor had beaten Hopkins at the time, Hopkins was still a 43 years old or whatever. And you also conveniently forget that Taylor was knocked senseless by Carl Froch and Pavlik before.
Compare Hopkins and Kovalev rather. Hopkins clearly the greater fighter, but a win over Kovalev means a helluva lot more than a win over Hopkins today. That's the analogy you should use.
How is it conveniently put in there? It's a fact. Brook fought the winner of Porter vs Alexander and Khan fought the loser. because you'd like Khan to stick his penis inside you, you're trying to say that fighting and beating the loser is better than fighting and beating the champion. Absolute nonsensical.
Yes, Porter > Alexander in every department. He showed that when both were at their best.
Comment