Even if floyd will knock out all the MMA and kick boxer of the world in a boxing match he can never surpass the greatness of pac.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dumb boxing fans saying Pacquiao is greater than Mayweather if he beats Thurman.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by pasawayako View PostEven if floyd will knock out all the MMA and kick boxer of the world in a boxing match he can never surpass the greatness of pac.
It was supposed to be Lomachenko, but you changed your mind when you found out he thought Pacquiao lost to Mayweather 8-4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View PostI don't even know where to begin.
Too many dumb ass boxing fans.
1. Pacquiao has been greater than Mayweather.
He's been greater than Mayweather since the Cotto fight.
2. It's not a question of IF Pacquiao beats Thurman but HOW. Pac W by KO, TKO, UD..... who knows?
Pacquiao win is a lock. Boxrec already updated his record to reflect the W I think.
Just wait until both stay retired.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FeFist View PostPacquiao winning enhanced his legacy, which enhances Mayweather's victory over him, so no.
Pacquiao can do what he wants in the time he has left. Win or lose, he will be 2nd to Floyd.
So if Pac beats Anthony joshua, Floyd fanboys will be saying Pac has just enhanced floyds victory over pac? Floyd fans just arent realistic! Floyd fans are nervous pac s going to beat thurman so are getting the excuses in early and are very defensive with it don't matter if Pac beats thurman or calum smith type comments. Even though boxing fans think Floyd ducked thurman after thurman beat guerrero.
I'm not aware of anyone genuinely thinking Floyd s greater. You always get impression they are taking the MickeyLast edited by hugh grant; 05-31-2019, 03:07 AM.
Comment
-
It’s a hard argument, Floyd covered 5 divisions whereas Pacquiao has titles in 8 divisions and if my memory serves me correct, he also bypassed 2 divisions, that has to count for a lot, Floyd was tarnished with the IV scandal as well, 10 divisions is a hell of a lot from lightest fight to heaviest fight, that would equate to Floyd fighting until he reached cruiser weight or heavyweight, I couldn’t see Floyd being successful up there, in comparison, Pacquiao was
Comment
-
[QUOTE=travestyny;19785257]Who are you going to dlckride after Pac loses to Thurman. /QUOTE]
Nah The senator will beat the prime thurman.
Question is, what is your excuse to downplay pac next opponent? I'm 101% sure you have plenty of excuses ready just to downplay pac opponent even if it's crawford or Spence. lmao.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostIt’s a hard argument, Floyd covered 5 divisions whereas Pacquiao has titles in 8 divisions and if my memory serves me correct, he also bypassed 2 divisions, that has to count for a lot, Floyd was tarnished with the IV scandal as well, 10 divisions is a hell of a lot from lightest fight to heaviest fight, that would equate to Floyd fighting until he reached cruiser weight or heavyweight, I couldn’t see Floyd being successful up there, in comparison, Pacquiao was
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostIt’s a hard argument, Floyd covered 5 divisions whereas Pacquiao has titles in 8 divisions and if my memory serves me correct, he also bypassed 2 divisions, that has to count for a lot, Floyd was tarnished with the IV scandal as well, 10 divisions is a hell of a lot from lightest fight to heaviest fight, that would equate to Floyd fighting until he reached cruiser weight or heavyweight, I couldn’t see Floyd being successful up there, in comparison, Pacquiao was
Comment
Comment