If Pacquiao beats Thurman he has to rank over Floyd historically

[hmc87]

what win does Manny have better then Floyds win over Manny himself?? and Canelo was p4p top 10 and a unified champ/ring champ..Floyd also dominated JMM who returned to the same weight and ko'd Manny at an even older age

The Floyd Manny fight was very close no matter what some people like to think. Even if you scored it 10-2..those rounds were all close. Floyd did just enough in most rounds to win it, but he never made Manny look foolish. Not until rounds 10 or 11 was it clear Floyd was in control.

If Manny beats Thurman, Porter/Spence winner, Crawford in convincing fashion at 40-41...that's better than the Canelo win for me. Especially since Crawford is PFP #1 atm

[BLASTER1]

If Manny unifies at this stage of his career, then their should be no doubt who is/was better.
But the odds of that happening are virtually nil when you counter in actually making these fights before he is really over the hill, the skills will definitely start to fade even quicker at this age plus boxing politics ain't gonna let a 42-43 Yr old to unify the division when the cash cows are all the younger guys.
Just not going to happen.

[hugh grant]

Ok

Floyd's win over Manny is aging well too if he beats Thurman

If Pac beats Thurman, winner of Spence/Porter, and THEN Crawford...he has a real case.

The biggest obstacle is Floyd's win over Canelo. That win is aging very, very well

PACs win over cotto is ageing real well also. Because cotto beat Sergio Martinez can we give pac a win over Sergio also and call pac a 9division champ..? Bobby watts fans don’t say his win over Hagler is ageing well. Neither does rjj fans say his win over bh is ageing well when bh was beating everyone as underdog as old man.
Floyd fans are literally the only ones who have the cheek and audacity to. If pac beats Calum Smith floyd fans will say floods win over pac is ageing well, even though pac had shoulder injury, many thinking flood lost to pac

Can pac have a cw with Thurman at least? Floyd can do it and his fans turn a blind eye like it don’t exist. Ignore nelo nowhere near prime also and even with 100 fights under belt was vastly inexperienced a bit like wilder having 40 fights against nobodies

[pasawayako]

See you can’t be unbiased and objective. Many people thought manny lost all 4 to jmm. Media had him losing the 2nd and 3rd fights. Do you call those gift wins for manny?

The losses count. Manny’s wins don’t erase the losses from his resume. That is why he is always well behind Floyd in every ranking of ATG boxers.

Nunbers don't lie bro and he's achievements in boxing is nowhere near to pac. Pac is way ahead in everything.

[pasawayako]

floyd was lineal at

130
135
147-2 times
154
atleast get your facts straight

now name a win Manny has better then floyd over Manny himself

Sorry A gift win doesn't count.

[pasawayako]

This guy thinks he is the greatest: https://youtu.be/dP1GV7L-SJo

I have to agree. There's no boxer from the past to present or the next 100 years can do what pac had achieved.

8 division champion
5 division lineal champion
3x FIGHTER OF THE YEAR
FIGHTER OF THE DECADE

An unbelievable achievements.

[hmc87]

PACs win over cotto is ageing real well also. Because cotto beat Sergio Martinez can we give pac a win over Sergio also and call pac a 9division champ..? Bobby watts fans don’t say his win over Hagler is ageing well. Neither does rjj fans say his win over bh is ageing well when bh was beating everyone as underdog as old man.
Floyd fans are literally the only ones who have the cheek and audacity to. If floyd beats Calum Smith floyd fans will say floods win over pac is ageing well, even though pac had shoulder injury, many thinking flood lost to pac

Can pac have a cw with Thurman at least? Floyd can do it and his fans turn a blind eye like it don’t exist. Ignore nelo nowhere near prime also and even with 100 fights under belt was vastly inexperienced a bit like wilder having 40 fights against nobodies

This is what's wrong with *******s.

Pac had a CW with Cotto, Margarito (and a rehydration clause), and JMM 3.

Floyd had a CW against Canelo.

Try not to get into an "eye for an eye" in any argument. Neither get has an impeccable record; not Floyd nor Manny.

As it stands Floyd is the superior ATG. Manny does have a chance to surpass him though if he can unify at WW at 40-41 years old. That would be something special as Crawford and Spence are considered Top 10 P4P on many lsits

[The Big Dunn]

No it isn’t. Most American fighters fights outside of their home state. They don’t fight outside the country because there is more money to be made here. the judges travel around the world and the rings are roughly the same size. If you don’t want the big bucks don’t come to America.

No one credibly thinks manny beat Floyd. The only way you can make manny better is lie or make up unprovable theories about 2 out 3. Insane.

Floyd is ranked higher. You know he had floyd higher but you lie to try and make a point. If you really thought manny was better you wouldn’t make up gerrymandered criteria. You’d just go with resume.

Manny will just never be ranked ahead of Floyd in any ATG poll because he lost to far inferior fighters while Floyd hasn’t , doesn’t have a win better than Floyd’s best 2 wins, and because Floyd beat him head up.

You can lie and play dumb but you can’t change historical facts no matter how hard you try. Just be satisfied your favorite fighter is #2 in his era. I wonder if they had another poll of fair and unbiased media and historians would manny even be ahead of bhop.

You never explain yourself when people tell you they don't understand your comments.
Well people want to know how you conclude floyds cw win over nelo is better than pac s best wins.? What is your criteria for ne o being such a good win?
Nel o wasn't prime! He was drained! He wasn't a p fp fighter in most eyes also! What adversity did he overcome?. On contrary he tried getting things in favour. And we know what happens when you try getting advantages don't we? It takes away from win. So exactly why is it a great win? Floyd beats weakest versions and his fans blow the wins up to epic proportions. Nelo would have been an ok win under normal circumstances. But nelo was far from prime. It was a CW and nelo had no real good wins of note.mSo whynhavevyou elevated the win for Floyd so much? PACs win over cotto was better
Explain yourself and stop being Parrott like. I know your embarrassed citeing the win as Floyd s best win and why you won't mention the obvious shortcomings of that win.

Quote the whole post. Canelo is Floyd’s 2nd best win. Manny is his best. Find a win on Manny’s resume better than either. You can’t .

Funny you should bring up cotto because that was a cw as well. According to you losses and cw’s don’t count when it’s manny but cw wins take away from Floyd’s resume. That is incredibly biased. If Canelo was drained we can argue cotto was as well. Manny beat the weakest versions of odh, morales, Shane, hatton, and margs. 3 of those guys Floyd beat before manny did.

Manny had advantages in all those fights. When you compare Floyd and manny using the same criteria, Floyd always comes out ahead. But you use some crazy biased formula where you give extra points for wins for manny and never count losses or draws and forgive all cw’s.

Just like manny you have to cheat for him to have any chance at being #1.

[hugh grant]

This is what's wrong with *******s.

Pac had a CW with Cotto, Margarito (and a rehydration clause), and JMM 3.

Floyd had a CW against Canelo.

Try not to get into an "eye for an eye" in any argument. Neither get has an impeccable record; not Floyd nor Manny.

As it stands Floyd is the superior ATG. Manny does have a chance to surpass him though if he can unify at WW at 40-41 years old. That would be something special as Crawford and Spence are considered Top 10 P4P on many lsits

Pac s greater than Floyd a lready, the whole world knows that. But that's beside the point.
At 40 why can't Pac just beat thurman, and let thurman fight and beat spence and Pac live off royalties? It wasn't realistic for Floyd to clean up at 36 so why Pac at 40 with 70 fights to fight thurman, spence and crawford when they've not even fought each other once yet. Anything Floyd fans say is unrealistic.
why can't Floyd fans ever say a Floyd win isn't ageing well?.when Pac annihilated hatton, why couldn't Floyd fans say Floyd s win don't look so good now? When Pac destroyed dlh, why can't Floyd fans say well done pac, we've now put Floyd s win over dlh into context?

[Eff Pandas]

Y'all mfers who care about this fantasy ranking sh^t so much need to play more dungeons & dragons & leave boxing alone.

This is all speculative child-like bs. There is no ATG rankings reallllllly. And 99% of you cats talking about it are the worst judgers of this any damn way cuz most of you haven't studied the great fighters of the past to comment on all time great type sh^t.

And specifically with MayPac sh^t most of you are so biased with those two guys one way or another you can't see the forest for the trees on any subject involving those two legends of the game.