Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Parker Have Contingency Plans if Fury Hit By PED Suspension

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Team Parker Have Contingency Plans if Fury Hit By PED Suspension

    Joseph Parker's promoters have contingencies in place should Hughie Fury receive a ban for allegedly failing a drugs test two years ago and be ruled out of his mandatory world heavyweight title shot against the New Zealander.

    Fury, and his heavyweight cousin Tyson, allegedly failed a test for banned substance nandrolone in 2015, and Britain's Daily Mail has reported that the pair will have their long-delayed hearing in mid-April.

    The news, which Parker's promoter David Higgins said he was aware of, will likely frustrate the Kiwi's camp, as, had the Furys signed their fight contract earlier, the bout for the WBO title would have been held in early April, before the hearing.

    Instead, the Englishmen held off, and, unfortunately for all concerned, the fight has been put back to early May. The details will be announced next week, with Higgins saying no date had been confirmed but that he hoped the fight would be held in New Zealand.

    Higgins told the Herald that should Fury be ruled out -- and he and Tyson have vehemently denied taking nandrolone, a prohibited steroid -- the 25-year-old Parker would fight someone else.

    "The boxing business is about hedging and contingencies," Higgins said. "You're silly to only have one option, and certainly if anything like that happened, you'd have someone solid and credible and at least at the same or better level on standby ready to draft in.

    "We can line up an alternative opponent who is at least as good as Hughie Fury. There are a lot of options, but at this point Hughie Fury is the mandatory."

    The Daily Mail reported that the British Boxing Board of Control had urged the United Kingdom Anti-Doping authority to process the steroid accusations and it is believed the hearing is pencilled in for mid-April.

    Despite the allegedly positive results being reported after tests in 2015, UKAD took until the British summer of 2016 to impose temporary suspensions on both men but then lifted that probation, the Mail reported.

    The newspaper said there had been no word on B-sample testing and Hughie and Tyson claim they may have been the accidental victims of eating contaminated meat.

    Tyson, the former WBO, WBA and IBF world champion, relinquished his belts after admitting to a cocaine habit and mental health issues.

    Robert Smith, secretary-general of the Board, told the Mail: "We entrust UKAD with all our anti-doping procedures and we are very disappointed this matter has still not been resolved.

    "We have frequently corresponded with UKAD, asking them to hold the hearing and very much want them to do so now, at the earliest opportunity."

    Parker's alternative opponent is unlikely to be WBC champion Deontay Wilder, who defended his title with a knockout victory against Gerald Washington in Alabama at the weekend.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news...ectid=11809112

  • #2
    Finally, FINALLY a press release on this issue.

    Comment


    • #3
      So if the fight isn't until May and Fury is out, why not Wilder?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Rip Chudd View Post
        So if the fight isn't until May and Fury is out, why not Wilder?
        Fury's not out until he gets a ban. Which he definitely should.

        Unless the UKAD is completely corrupt he should get a ban, but hard to know what's gonna happen.

        Good to see they're going with the age-old "it was in my meat" excuse. Worked for Lucas Browne!

        Comment


        • #5
          Accidental victims of eating contaminated meat, nice try you dirty Gypsies. denium get your ass in here boy and tell your boyfriend Kafkod the sad news.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by keith_head View Post
            Fury's not out until he gets a ban. Which he definitely should.

            Unless the UKAD is completely corrupt he should get a ban, but hard to know what's gonna happen.

            Good to see they're going with the age-old "it was in my meat" excuse. Worked for Lucas Browne!
            Worked for Eric Morales and Francisco Vargas too

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              Joseph Parker's promoters have contingencies in place should Hughie Fury receive a ban for allegedly failing a drugs test two years ago and be ruled out of his mandatory world heavyweight title shot against the New Zealander.

              Fury, and his heavyweight cousin Tyson, allegedly failed a test for banned substance nandrolone in 2015, and Britain's Daily Mail has reported that the pair will have their long-delayed hearing in mid-April.

              The news, which Parker's promoter David Higgins said he was aware of, will likely frustrate the Kiwi's camp, as, had the Furys signed their fight contract earlier, the bout for the WBO title would have been held in early April, before the hearing.

              Instead, the Englishmen held off, and, unfortunately for all concerned, the fight has been put back to early May. The details will be announced next week, with Higgins saying no date had been confirmed but that he hoped the fight would be held in New Zealand.

              Higgins told the Herald that should Fury be ruled out -- and he and Tyson have vehemently denied taking nandrolone, a prohibited steroid -- the 25-year-old Parker would fight someone else.

              "The boxing business is about hedging and contingencies," Higgins said. "You're silly to only have one option, and certainly if anything like that happened, you'd have someone solid and credible and at least at the same or better level on standby ready to draft in.

              "We can line up an alternative opponent who is at least as good as Hughie Fury. There are a lot of options, but at this point Hughie Fury is the mandatory."

              The Daily Mail reported that the British Boxing Board of Control had urged the United Kingdom Anti-Doping authority to process the steroid accusations and it is believed the hearing is pencilled in for mid-April.

              Despite the allegedly positive results being reported after tests in 2015, UKAD took until the British summer of 2016 to impose temporary suspensions on both men but then lifted that probation, the Mail reported.

              The newspaper said there had been no word on B-sample testing and Hughie and Tyson claim they may have been the accidental victims of eating contaminated meat.

              Tyson, the former WBO, WBA and IBF world champion, relinquished his belts after admitting to a cocaine habit and mental health issues.

              Robert Smith, secretary-general of the Board, told the Mail: "We entrust UKAD with all our anti-doping procedures and we are very disappointed this matter has still not been resolved.

              "We have frequently corresponded with UKAD, asking them to hold the hearing and very much want them to do so now, at the earliest opportunity."

              Parker's alternative opponent is unlikely to be WBC champion Deontay Wilder, who defended his title with a knockout victory against Gerald Washington in Alabama at the weekend.

              http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news...ectid=11809112
              Glad to read of the highlighted bit here, So no word on B-sample test, even though posters on here are claiming that the B-sample came back clean. But now its contaminated meat? SMDH

              Comment


              • #8
                Hope we finally get some clarification on this story soon. It all seems a bit blurry at the moment. The story was first told in the tabloids and there's hardly been any word from UKAD or the BBBoC on it and conflicting reports.

                It's hard to believe any excuses these days though...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Ray* View Post
                  Glad to read of the highlighted bit here, So no word on B-sample test, even though posters on here are claiming that the B-sample came back clean. But now its contaminated meat? SMDH


                  Comment


                  • #10
                    dear united kingdom...drug hearing, drug test.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP