Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Survives Near Disaster, Decisions Joseph Parker

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SeGoodland View Post
    Does he deserve the shot at Wilder? I think he would really trouble him.
    He'd do better against Joshua than Wilder imo.
    A Chisora rematch would be good though!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
      So Wilder will fight Joshua like Joshua is a mover... even though Joshua isn't a mover? Exactly how many Wilder fights have you seen? Seems like you are forming a judgment based off YouTube highlights.
      I’ll answer that first question by returning a question: you think Wilder is going to fight Joshua like he isn’t at risk of getting hurt badly? He’s staying well out of range until (if) he lands something meaningful.

      Yeah, i’ve watched Wilder struggle in all of his fights in full since Spilizika (Is that how you spell it? I don’t know). I tell you now, he’ll be on the back foot all night.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by tokon View Post
        He'd do better against Joshua than Wilder imo.
        A Chisora rematch would be good though!

        1) He’d bully and harry Wilder all night in a neutral environment (certainly would in the UK). I could see him and Wilder getting broken up all night fighting in the U.S. and that would absolutely play into Wilder’s hands. After all, Whyte’s tactics are tantamount to cheating.
        An English ref would let tactics like that go in England for a Whyte-AJ fight so I see your point.
        Don’t know where you’re from but What most don’t understand is that British refs (in all sports, especially football/soccer) are lenient when it comes to the physical side, even if it creeps into illegal play. They give the benefit of the doubt for roughhousing a lot


        2) It would be great but unless Whyte come unstuck soon, Chisora is a backward step.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
          I think I know what you are trying to imply but how can you write a mere 6 words and the sentence is so confusing. I not even referring to the there and their that is an easy enough mistake my 8 year old has trouble with that too
          I am surpised you have time too look after an 8 year old considering you spend a lot of time defending aj.

          You only saw the back of his head once in a casino you happen to frequent and you're defending him like the brother he's never had since.

          Was that correct use of you're? Instead of your? The 8 year old fluffy haired little winkle you got struggle with that too does he?
          Last edited by King Arthur; 08-01-2018, 11:34 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by P to the J View Post
            I’ll answer that first question by returning a question: you think Wilder is going to fight Joshua like he isn’t at risk of getting hurt badly? He’s staying well out of range until (if) he lands something meaningful.

            Yeah, i’ve watched Wilder struggle in all of his fights in full since Spilizika (Is that how you spell it? I don’t know). I tell you now, he’ll be on the back foot all night.
            So you call Stiverne II a struggle? Did he struggle to put Ortiz on his back 3 times BEFORE the 7th round. Did he struggle with Arreola? Smh...come on man. If Joshua approaches the fight like Washington and Szpilka, then you will see Wilder look sloppy and hesitant. Otherwise you will see him jab to the head and body, punch off the back foot, initiate clinches and go to the body, and throw overhand tights with bad intentions.

            I'm not guaranteeing a Wilder win over Joshua, but how you see the fight playing out runs counter to both fighters style.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Just looking View Post
              HAHAHA, so for Ortiz it had to be one day and for Parker it could be any? Weak excuse
              I'm sorry but I don't even know what this means? Please elaborate.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by King Arthur View Post
                I am surpised you have time too look after an 8 year old considering you spend a lot of time defending aj.

                You only saw the back of his head once in a casino you happen to frequent and you're defending him like the brother he's never had since.

                Was that correct use of you're? Instead of your? The 8 year old fluffy haired little winkle you got struggle with that too does he?
                Why don’t you have kids? Don’t worry about what I’m doing and focus on what you are doing. At least I’m defending someone that knows my name , knows my son and we share mutual friends. You come on here and just rant. What are you looking to achieve by doing that? Look at my posts if you post and say Wilder will flatten Joshua who am I to say anything. It’s just banter. However grown men like yourself getting emotional about a man you have never met is weird. By all means say your piece but everyday saying the same thing. Lol I find it funny . I see you have been on my Facebook and know I attend the casino so when I tell you all I care about is my own money you know I’m not all talk. That fluffy haired boy you are referring to has a custom made £1800 Gucci leather jacket that you chose to not mention�� . The car is mine too. Ciao buddy
                Last edited by Noelanthony; 08-01-2018, 01:14 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by P to the J View Post
                  I’ll answer that first question by returning a question: you think Wilder is going to fight Joshua like he isn’t at risk of getting hurt badly? He’s staying well out of range until (if) he lands something meaningful.

                  Yeah, i’ve watched Wilder struggle in all of his fights in full since Spilizika (Is that how you spell it? I don’t know). I tell you now, he’ll be on the back foot all night.
                  That is a very impartial and I believe correct assessment. I don’t know whether you are pro Wilder or Pro Joshua which is very rare nowadays. I haven’t read your other comments mind you

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
                    Why don’t you have kids? Don’t worry about what I’m doing and focus on what you are doing. At least I’m defending someone that knows my name , knows my son and we share mutual friends. You come on here and just rant. What are you looking to achieve by doing that? Look at my posts if you post and say Wilder will flatten Joshua who am I to say anything. It’s just banter. However grown men like yourself getting emotional about a man you have never met is weird. By all means say your piece but everyday saying the same thing. Lol I find it funny . I see you have been on my Facebook and know I attend the casino so when I tell you all I care about is my own money you know I’m not all talk. That fluffy haired boy you are referring to has a custom made £1800 Gucci leather jacket that you chose to not mention�� . The car is mine too. Ciao buddy
                    Half of you're post doesnt make sense you are confused pal. I know about the casino from seeing a post of yours previously nothing to do with facebook.

                    I highly doubt you know aj personally but cool story. And what's with this everyday saying the same thing? I havent been on here for days and check my posts before that i rarely mention aj. You've got you're wires crossed. But crack on anyway what a waste of £1800 that jacket is going to be too small before you know it.

                    Cool talking with you anyway, take care pal. Not into squabbling on the net. Its a mugs game waste of my time.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by P to the J View Post
                      You need to calm down but I you had me with this entire post until you went rogue and talked about Muslims at the end. You seem like the kind of guy who would go ****ing nuts and get in a police stand off.
                      you are right

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP