Wilder is ok with facing Fury for less money because he knows its a much safer fight. He isn't as confident in beating Joshua which is why he is demanding retirement money.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wilder comes to see Fury...but not AJ?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostA KO = a momentous occasion = a better fight..... you're already talking nonsense.
Does a KO mean it's a better fight? who is judging the quality of the fight? is it judged on excitement or boxing ability?
I think we'll need a poll to decide which was better, and the loser deletes their account.
But we'll go off of how the fights are reported and the general consensus.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarvardBlue View PostIt doesn't matter what Wilder said.
Hearn was running the show and he inisisted Wilder wouldn't be allowed in the ring. Even the Commission got involved.
Maybe Wilder lied because he didn't want to appear to be kowtowing to Hearn.
This has been a measuring contest between all parties involved. In this instance, Hearn got his wish to keep Wilder away from Joshua.
The Fury people don't seem to have that problem and Wilder showed up. I'm not even sure many people knew about Wilder and a restraining order until you brought it up.
Have some integrity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostYour eyes can tell you which is a better fight. This site is no place for such a poll.
But we'll go off of how the fights are reported and the general consensus.
Joshua/Povetkin will be a good fight I agree with you there.... I know Wilder/Fury will be a much more exciting event.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Madison View Postbecause he never fancied the job. ive never known the heavyweight champion of the world need the promoters permission to get in the ring. and if it came down to it and they prevent him getting in the ring then joshua would have looked like the biggest ***** going, it was win win either way for wilder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vinnykin View PostFair enough.
Joshua/Povetkin will be a good fight I agree with you there.... I know Wilder/Fury will be a much more exciting event.
The actual fight ? I would say no .
Joshua and Povetkin are going to have some clashes here , i think Joshua smashes him up .
Fury and Wilder will have a lot of lack luster rnds and it will be more competitive but a better fight with two back foot fighters ? Only way that happens if Wilder goes after Fury .
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View PostSo team Joshua first insisted that Wilder fight one of their stablemates, then presented a ridiculous low ball offer, then named their price and when that price was met back peddled all to hell, then sent a contract with no date but it's team Wilder that didn't "fancy" the job? GTFOH!
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View PostSo team Joshua first insisted that Wilder fight one of their stablemates, then presented a ridiculous low ball offer, then named their price and when that price was met back peddled all to hell, then sent a contract with no date but it's team Wilder that didn't "fancy" the job? GTFOH!
Team Joshua offered Whyte as a U.K fight when Wilder rejected 12.5 Million .
The low ball offer of 15 that Wilder the 1.4 Million man agreed to ? That WAS the contract . lol
Why do you Wilderettes rewrite history ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostYou just said in your first post that Wilder said Hearn wouldn't let him come into the ring...now you're saying it doesnt matter what he said?
Have some integrity.
Wilder said he wanted to come to the fight and come into the ring. Hearn said he wouldn't be allowed. The commission backed him up. Wilder didn't show up. End of story.
Now you're making it a "gotcha" situation and blaming Wilder.
It doesn't matter what he said because Hearn made it clear he wouldn't be welcomed or allowed in the ring. Wilder's "excuse" for not appearing is irrelevant. Why you're making Wilder's comments an issue is beyond me and embarrassing on your part.
Comment
Comment